Critical Design Review

From 2006.igem.org

Revision as of 03:34, 12 July 2006 (view source) Chuck (Talk | contribs) ← Older edit		Revision as of 23:12, 12 July 2006 (view source) Herak (Talk | contribs) Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	<h2>July 11, 2006</h2>	+	'''Tuesday, July 11, 2006 '''
		+
		+	The First Critical Design Review meeting took place today at 3pm.
		+
		+	==Attendees==
		+	#Charles Yoon
		+	#Herak Sikder
		+
		+	==Topics of Discussion==
		+	* What do the Design Review committee have ?
		+	Answer: We have the design, the biobrick parts used for the design, the mathematical modelling and the basic idea of how the biological thermometer is supposed to work.
		+
		+	* What do we lack ?
		+	Answer: No experimental datas to back up the design and its modelling. Most of the biobricks parts used in the design are not verified functionally via testing.
		+
		+	==Outcomes of the meeting==
		+	* Each member should go through the design thoroughly. They should get familiar with the parts used in the design.
		+	* A second meeting is set up on 13th July, Thursday at 3pm.
		+
		+	==Agenda for the 2nd meeting==
		+	* Come up with a strategy to test the existing design. For instance: how to test critical parts of the design individually before being integrated to the overall genetic circuit.
		+	* Come up with a reasonable time line for the testing.
		+	* Think of the kind and range of values we are expecting from the testing.
		+	* Discuss on ways to improve the design or to substitute parts in the design.
		+
		+
		+	'''NOTE: All the attendees of the meeting on thurdays are encouraged to bring print out of the design of the Cell-See-Us thermometer with you.'''

---

Revision as of 23:12, 12 July 2006

Tuesday, July 11, 2006

The First Critical Design Review meeting took place today at 3pm.

Contents 1 Attendees 2 Topics of Discussion 3 Outcomes of the meeting 4 Agenda for the 2nd meeting

Attendees

1. Charles Yoon
2. Herak Sikder

Topics of Discussion

• What do the Design Review committee have ?

Answer: We have the design, the biobrick parts used for the design, the mathematical modelling and the basic idea of how the biological thermometer is supposed to work.

• What do we lack ?

Answer: No experimental datas to back up the design and its modelling. Most of the biobricks parts used in the design are not verified functionally via testing.

Outcomes of the meeting

• Each member should go through the design thoroughly. They should get familiar with the parts used in the design.
• A second meeting is set up on 13th July, Thursday at 3pm.

Agenda for the 2nd meeting

• Come up with a strategy to test the existing design. For instance: how to test critical parts of the design individually before being integrated to the overall genetic circuit.
• Come up with a reasonable time line for the testing.
• Think of the kind and range of values we are expecting from the testing.
• Discuss on ways to improve the design or to substitute parts in the design.

NOTE: All the attendees of the meeting on thurdays are encouraged to bring print out of the design of the Cell-See-Us thermometer with you.