Harvard 2006

From 2006.igem.org

Revision as of 04:19, 29 October 2006 by ShawnDouglas (Talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Harvard University 2006 iGEM Team
HarvardTeamPhoto2006.jpg
Students
  • Tiffany Chan
  • Katherine Fifer
  • Lewis Hahn
  • Hetmann Hsieh
  • Jeffrey Lau
  • Valerie Lau
  • Matthew Meisel
  • David Ramos
  • Zhipeng Sun
  • Perry Tsai

Teaching Fellows

Faculty Advisors

The Harvard University 2006 iGEM Team

This year Harvard's team consisted of 10 undergraduate students, with backgrounds in molecular and cellular biology, biochemistry, and computer science. With the help of five faculty advisors and three graduate-level teaching advisors, they devised and executed three separate projects.

1. Construction of novel DNA nanostructures for the purpose of stealth drug delivery,

2. Exploration of cell-surface targeting using interchangable and linkable aptamers (adaptamers) and Lpp-OmpA fusion vehicle for bacterial surface display.

3. Reconstitution of a circadian oscillator from cyanobacteria into E. coli,


DNA Nanobox: A Nanoscale Device for Stealth Drug Delivery

Project Overview

  • Traditional drug delivery is surprisingly low-tech. Tablets containing a mixture of active small molecules and binders are ingested, and the small molecules circulate non-specifically throughout the body. Even when a specific cell or tissue type is targeted (e.g. cancerous cells or bacterial infections), many other tissues are exposed to the drugs, often with serious side effects. We envision a future in which medicines will be delivered in a highly specific manner to targeted tissues and cell types, and set out to make initial steps toward realizing this vision.
  • Our goal for the summer was to design and implement nanoscale molecular containers, which could be dynamically opened and closed by an external stimulus. This is the first step to making more sophisticated drug-delivery vehicles.
  • The containers were implemented as DNA nanostructures, which afford a significant degree of positional control and chemical versatility.
  • To demonstrate that our designs successfully self-assembled, we used negative-stain electron microscopy to visualize the containers.
  • As an initial proof-of-concept, we planned to demonstrate that our DNA containers could be used to "protect" biotinylated oligonucleotides from binding by streptavidin-coated magnetic beads.
  • We were able to successfully show that nanoboxes with internal biotinylated oligonucleotides did not bind to streptavidin-coated magnetic beads, while nanoboxes that were externally decorated with biotinylated oligonucleotides were bound by the same beads.

Results

  • The following images show our most successful container design, both as a 3D cartoon and in actual negative-stain EM images. The length, width, and depth of this container design is approximately 30x30x30 nanometers, so it is bigger than a typical ribosome.
  • More details about this design can be found here.
  • The basic design of this container is a hexagonal barrel, closed off by two flat lids.
  • The lids are designed to reversible attach to the barrel using complementary oligonucleotides using a "toehold" strategy in which the strands include unpaired overhangs that can be displaced with the addition of oligos that match for the full length of the sequence.
  • Unfortunately, we did not have time to image our lid designs, or couple the lid and barrel and image the complete closed container.

Future Plans

  • We have demonstrated the first steps toward building a sophisticated, versatile drug delivery vehicle out of DNA.
  • Short term plans include assembly of closed containers (which include lids), and further characterization of assembled structures (both imaging and functional assays). We do not yet know what is the maximum size for a molecule that can still diffuse in and out of our container, but for a closed container we expect it to be around 1 nanometer in diameter.
  • In the long term, we envision designing containers that incorporate cell-surface targeting mechanisms that would allow delivery of a payload to a specific cell type. Advances also need to be made if the container is going to deliver small molecules - perhaps by encapsulating the container with a liposome (or vice versa).

Cell Surface Targeting

Adaptamers

Project Overview

  • We are interested in the mostly equivalent problems of targeting substrates to cells and cells to substrates. In the former case, targeting a substrate to the cell would facilitate uptake and a subsequent cellular response, important in fields such as drug delivery. Directing cells to particular places, for instance, a column, could be used to isolate cells and perform diagnostics.
  • Briefly, we are pursuing two methods to attack this problem. In one route, we will express streptavidin on the E. coli cell surface, hence providing a target for any biotinylated molecule. In the second, we will build on the work of Tahiri-Alaoui et al. (2002) in developing bi-specific DNA "adaptamers" that can bind a cell surface and a substrate.

Results

Future Plans

Cell Surface Fusion Proteins

Project Overview

Results

Future Plans

A Circadian Oscillator for E.coli

Project Overview

Results

Future Plans

Complete Electronic Notebooks

Detailed records of our summer activities, including results, can be found on openwetware, which the team used to host its electronic notebook.

Personal tools
Past/present/future years