IGEM 2005 Awards

From 2006.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Awards Given out at the Jamboree)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
The following awards were given out at the 2005 Jamboree
 +
+Princeton
 +
++Best Plasmid Naming Scheme
 +
++Best "Show Must Go On" Moment
 +
++Best Honest Answer
 +
++Best Simulation of a Simulation
-
Princeton
+
+Oklahoma
-
Best Plasmid Naming Scheme
+
++Best "Hail Mary" Cloning
-
Best "Show Must Go On" Moment
+
++Best "Quantitative" Answer  
-
Best Honest Answer  
+
++Feynman's Teaching Award
-
Best Simulation of a Simulation
+
-
Oklahoma
+
+ETH
-
Best "Hail Mary" Cloning
+
++Best Wiki Award
-
Best "Quantitative" Answer
+
++Most Sensitive Super Model Award
-
Feynman's Teaching Award
+
++Precision Engineering Award  
-
ETH
+
+MIT
-
Best Wiki Award
+
++Most Modest Goal
-
Most Sensitive Super Model Award
+
++Least Transportable Visual Aid
-
Precision Engineering Award  
+
++Best Analogy
 +
++Second Most Parts Award
-
MIT
+
+Caltech
-
Most Modest Goal
+
++Best Use of Transmogrified Smiley Faces
-
Least Transportable Visual Aid
+
++Best New Application Area
-
Best Analogy
+
++Best New New Foundational Research Area
-
Second Most Parts Award
+
++Chuck D.'s Choice Award
-
Caltech
+
+Toronto
-
Best Use of Transmogrified Smiley Faces
+
++Best Project Name (Cell-See-Us)
-
Best New Application Area
+
++Most Direct Use of Logic
-
Best New New Foundational Research Area
+
++Best Advice
-
Chuck D.'s Choice Award
+
++Nothing-Will-Stop-Us Award
-
Toronto
+
+Cambridge
-
Best Project Name (Cell-See-Us)
+
++Most Effective Approach
-
Most Direct Use of Logic
+
++Best Master of Ceremonies
-
Best Advice
+
++Marshall Cultural Exchange Award  
-
Nothing-Will-Stop-Us Award
+
++Best Data & Data Visuals
 +
++Best Uniforms
-
Cambridge
+
+Texas
-
Most Effective Approach
+
++Best Confession / Negative Control (One Year Late)
-
Best Master of Ceremonies
+
++Best Live Demo, Again
-
Marshall Cultural Exchange Award
+
++Best Model-Driven Design
-
Best Data & Data Visuals
+
++Best Proposed Funding Mechanism
-
Best Uniforms
+
-
Texas
+
+Penn State
-
Best Confession / Negative Control (One Year Late)
+
++Best Brick Award (BBa_S03271, MotB)
-
Best Live Demo, Again
+
++Best New Sport (Beijing 2008 or bust!)
-
Best Model-Driven Design
+
++Best Use of Metaphor
-
Best Proposed Funding Mechanism
+
-
Penn State
+
+Berkeley
-
Best Brick Award (BBa_S03271, MotB)
+
++Red-Eye Award
-
Best New Sport (Beijing 2008 or bust!)
+
++XXXtreme Presentation
-
Best Use of Metaphor
+
++Best Conceptual Advance
 +
++Most Innovative Brick Award (BBa_J01002)
-
Berkeley
+
+Davidson
-
Red-Eye Award
+
++Best Team Name (SynthAces)
-
XXXtreme Presentation
+
++Best Debuggers
-
Best Conceptual Advance
+
++Best Interface Logic
-
Most Innovative Brick Award (BBa_J01002)
+
-
Davidson
+
+Harvard
-
Best Team Name (SynthAces)
+
++Best Part Numbers
-
Best Debuggers
+
++Most Organized Presentation
-
Best Interface Logic
+
++Best Technology Integration Award
 +
++Most Parts Award
 +
++Best TAATACGACTCACTATAGGGAGA Award
 +
++Best Use of Redundancy
-
Harvard
+
+UCSF
-
Best Part Numbers
+
++Coolest Part
-
Most Organized Presentation
+
++Most Innovative Abuse of Expensive Laboratory Equipment
-
Best Technology Integration Award
+
++Best Device Award  
-
Most Parts Award
+
++Most Thoughtful Approach
-
Best TAATACGACTCACTATAGGGAGA Award
+
-
Best Use of Redundancy
+
-
UCSF
+
==Highlights (some of the things that worked)==
-
Coolest Part
+
+Cambridge - Chemical control of bacterial chemotaxis using BioBrick parts, writing DNA to store information (flipase switch)
-
Most Innovative Abuse of Expensive Laboratory Equipment
+
+Texas - Working and improved bacterial photography and signal processing device (built from BioBricks)
-
Best Device Award
+
+Berkeley - Two-way cell-cell DNA communication (could lead to a bacterial internet)
-
Most Thoughtful Approach
+
+MIT - Iron-induced control of any BioBrick device
-
 
+
+Penn State - Genetic control of bacterial chemotaxis using BioBricks (MotB)
-
Highlights (some of the things that worked)
+
+Harvard - write and erase components for a bacterial sketch pad; stamped bacterial patterns to make "biowires."
-
Cambridge - Chemical control of bacterial chemotaxis using BioBrick parts, writing DNA to store information (flipase switch)
+
+UCSF - wanted biological temperature detector, got a programmable biological thermometer
-
Texas - Working and improved bacterial photography and signal processing device (built from BioBricks)
+
-
Berkeley - Two-way cell-cell DNA communication (could lead to a bacterial internet)
+
-
MIT - Iron-induced control of any BioBrick device
+
-
Penn State - Genetic control of bacterial chemotaxis using BioBricks (MotB)
+
-
Harvard - write and erase components for a bacterial sketch pad; stamped bacterial patterns to make "biowires."
+
-
UCSF - wanted biological temperature detector, got a programmable biological thermometer
+

Revision as of 16:13, 7 November 2005

The following awards were given out at the 2005 Jamboree

+Princeton ++Best Plasmid Naming Scheme ++Best "Show Must Go On" Moment ++Best Honest Answer ++Best Simulation of a Simulation

+Oklahoma ++Best "Hail Mary" Cloning ++Best "Quantitative" Answer ++Feynman's Teaching Award

+ETH ++Best Wiki Award ++Most Sensitive Super Model Award ++Precision Engineering Award

+MIT ++Most Modest Goal ++Least Transportable Visual Aid ++Best Analogy ++Second Most Parts Award

+Caltech ++Best Use of Transmogrified Smiley Faces ++Best New Application Area ++Best New New Foundational Research Area ++Chuck D.'s Choice Award

+Toronto ++Best Project Name (Cell-See-Us) ++Most Direct Use of Logic ++Best Advice ++Nothing-Will-Stop-Us Award

+Cambridge ++Most Effective Approach ++Best Master of Ceremonies ++Marshall Cultural Exchange Award ++Best Data & Data Visuals ++Best Uniforms

+Texas ++Best Confession / Negative Control (One Year Late) ++Best Live Demo, Again ++Best Model-Driven Design ++Best Proposed Funding Mechanism

+Penn State ++Best Brick Award (BBa_S03271, MotB) ++Best New Sport (Beijing 2008 or bust!) ++Best Use of Metaphor

+Berkeley ++Red-Eye Award ++XXXtreme Presentation ++Best Conceptual Advance ++Most Innovative Brick Award (BBa_J01002)

+Davidson ++Best Team Name (SynthAces) ++Best Debuggers ++Best Interface Logic

+Harvard ++Best Part Numbers ++Most Organized Presentation ++Best Technology Integration Award ++Most Parts Award ++Best TAATACGACTCACTATAGGGAGA Award ++Best Use of Redundancy

+UCSF ++Coolest Part ++Most Innovative Abuse of Expensive Laboratory Equipment ++Best Device Award ++Most Thoughtful Approach

Highlights (some of the things that worked)

+Cambridge - Chemical control of bacterial chemotaxis using BioBrick parts, writing DNA to store information (flipase switch) +Texas - Working and improved bacterial photography and signal processing device (built from BioBricks) +Berkeley - Two-way cell-cell DNA communication (could lead to a bacterial internet) +MIT - Iron-induced control of any BioBrick device +Penn State - Genetic control of bacterial chemotaxis using BioBricks (MotB) +Harvard - write and erase components for a bacterial sketch pad; stamped bacterial patterns to make "biowires." +UCSF - wanted biological temperature detector, got a programmable biological thermometer

Personal tools
Past/present/future years