Talk:ETH Zurich 2006

From 2006.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m
 
(24 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
-
I think opening the discussion page could be useful...
+
<!--
 +
* use the "+" besides the "edit" on top to add new topics
 +
* you can create a signature with your name and date by entering [[User:Ajk|Ajk]] 15:51, 12 July 2006 (EDT) (that's four tilde)
 +
* indentions are made by adding as many colons as you want. Answers to a comment with one colon thus should start with two colons etc.
 +
-->
-
----
+
'''Structure'''
-
Concept part: The Output is mentioned in the text, but I think it would be worthwhile to include some arrows in the diagramm that expilcitly show where the output is taken from. [[User:Jonas|jonas]], Oct 26 2005
+
-
Re: Concept part: This is a Moore automaton. Which means that the output is solely dependent on the state (and not on the input). In other words: You can assign an output to each state (as it is mentioned in the text: 0 for states S1 to S3 and 1 for state S4). If you want to include the output in the state machine, you can include them as numbers in the circles of the states (i.e you write S1/0 S2/0 S3/0 S4/1). There are no arrows for the output. Arrows are always only for state transitions. [[User:Tamara|Tamara]], Oct 27 2005
+
I suggest to put the coordination part to the bottom and add a "team" part instead to the top --[[User:Dimo|Dimo]] 05:29, 30 October 2006 (EST)
-
I agree in behalf of the arrows (it's been some time since I had Technische Informatik :-) ). I just wanted to make sure that the picture is clear in a way that also biologists with a limited knowledge of FSM get the message immediately. But since there have been some emails today dealing with this issue, i'm sure you guys are taking care of this
+
 
-
[[User:Jonas|jonas]], Oct 27 2005
+
'''writing everything small?'''
 +
 
 +
I propose to have a correct usage of capital letters within our wiki (if possible). Texts are hard to read if everything is written small. Furthermore, it gives the impression of being not competent. --[[User:Dimo|Dimo]] 10:03, 26 October 2006 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
 
 +
'''everything on one page?'''
 +
 
 +
should this all stay on the entry page? with all the details? --[[User:Dimo|Dimo]] 10:06, 12 October 2006 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
: I see little reason to separate it, espacially at this point, unless there is a compelling reason why something cannot sensibly be placed on the front page. Maybe when finishing the documentation I'll worry about dividing it up. Granted the table of contents are too long but this wiki does not provide any means to control which sections show up there ... --[[User:Ajk|Ajk]] 10:13, 12 October 2006 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
'''Table of Contents on the Wiki'''
 +
 
 +
:You can eliminate the computer generated TOC by adding
 +
 
 +
:<underscore><underscore>NOTOC<underscord><underscore>        (Note: change the <underscore> to the underscore character)
 +
 
 +
:to the page.  Then, you can write your own TOC entries with total control. -- Randy
 +
 
 +
:: Thanks for the hint. As long as the wiki is volatile I want to have it generated automatically though. --[[User:Ajk|Ajk]] 04:01, 16 October 2006 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 11:27, 30 October 2006


Structure

I suggest to put the coordination part to the bottom and add a "team" part instead to the top --Dimo 05:29, 30 October 2006 (EST)


writing everything small?

I propose to have a correct usage of capital letters within our wiki (if possible). Texts are hard to read if everything is written small. Furthermore, it gives the impression of being not competent. --Dimo 10:03, 26 October 2006 (EDT)


everything on one page?

should this all stay on the entry page? with all the details? --Dimo 10:06, 12 October 2006 (EDT)

I see little reason to separate it, espacially at this point, unless there is a compelling reason why something cannot sensibly be placed on the front page. Maybe when finishing the documentation I'll worry about dividing it up. Granted the table of contents are too long but this wiki does not provide any means to control which sections show up there ... --Ajk 10:13, 12 October 2006 (EDT)

Table of Contents on the Wiki

You can eliminate the computer generated TOC by adding
<underscore><underscore>NOTOC<underscord><underscore> (Note: change the <underscore> to the underscore character)
to the page. Then, you can write your own TOC entries with total control. -- Randy
Thanks for the hint. As long as the wiki is volatile I want to have it generated automatically though. --Ajk 04:01, 16 October 2006 (EDT)
Retrieved from "http://2006.igem.org/wiki/index.php/Talk:ETH_Zurich_2006"
Personal tools
Past/present/future years