Talk:ETH Zurich 2006
From 2006.igem.org
(open page, comment about concept diagram) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Concept part: The Output is mentioned in the text, but I think it would be worthwhile to include some arrows in the diagramm that expilcitly show where the output is taken from. [[User:Jonas|jonas]], Oct 26 2005 | Concept part: The Output is mentioned in the text, but I think it would be worthwhile to include some arrows in the diagramm that expilcitly show where the output is taken from. [[User:Jonas|jonas]], Oct 26 2005 | ||
| + | |||
| + | Re: Concept part: This is a Moore automaton. Which means that the output is solely dependent on the state (and not on the input). In other words: You can assign an output to each state (as it is mentioned in the text: 0 for states S1 to S3 and 1 for state S4). If you want to include the output in the state machine, you can include them as numbers in the circles of the states (i.e you write S1/0 S2/0 S3/0 S4/1). There are no arrows for the output. Arrows are always only for state transitions. [[User:Tamara|Tamara]], Oct 27 2005 | ||
Revision as of 09:15, 27 October 2005
I think opening the discussion page could be useful...
Concept part: The Output is mentioned in the text, but I think it would be worthwhile to include some arrows in the diagramm that expilcitly show where the output is taken from. jonas, Oct 26 2005
Re: Concept part: This is a Moore automaton. Which means that the output is solely dependent on the state (and not on the input). In other words: You can assign an output to each state (as it is mentioned in the text: 0 for states S1 to S3 and 1 for state S4). If you want to include the output in the state machine, you can include them as numbers in the circles of the states (i.e you write S1/0 S2/0 S3/0 S4/1). There are no arrows for the output. Arrows are always only for state transitions. Tamara, Oct 27 2005
