Talk:ETH Zurich 2006
From 2006.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
m |
|||
| (One intermediate revision not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
* indentions are made by adding as many colons as you want. Answers to a comment with one colon thus should start with two colons etc. | * indentions are made by adding as many colons as you want. Answers to a comment with one colon thus should start with two colons etc. | ||
--> | --> | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Structure''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | I suggest to put the coordination part to the bottom and add a "team" part instead to the top --[[User:Dimo|Dimo]] 05:29, 30 October 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
'''writing everything small?''' | '''writing everything small?''' | ||
Latest revision as of 11:27, 30 October 2006
Structure
I suggest to put the coordination part to the bottom and add a "team" part instead to the top --Dimo 05:29, 30 October 2006 (EST)
writing everything small?
I propose to have a correct usage of capital letters within our wiki (if possible). Texts are hard to read if everything is written small. Furthermore, it gives the impression of being not competent. --Dimo 10:03, 26 October 2006 (EDT)
everything on one page?
should this all stay on the entry page? with all the details? --Dimo 10:06, 12 October 2006 (EDT)
- I see little reason to separate it, espacially at this point, unless there is a compelling reason why something cannot sensibly be placed on the front page. Maybe when finishing the documentation I'll worry about dividing it up. Granted the table of contents are too long but this wiki does not provide any means to control which sections show up there ... --Ajk 10:13, 12 October 2006 (EDT)
Table of Contents on the Wiki
- You can eliminate the computer generated TOC by adding
- <underscore><underscore>NOTOC<underscord><underscore> (Note: change the <underscore> to the underscore character)
- to the page. Then, you can write your own TOC entries with total control. -- Randy
- Thanks for the hint. As long as the wiki is volatile I want to have it generated automatically though. --Ajk 04:01, 16 October 2006 (EDT)
