University of California San Francisco 2006

From 2006.igem.org

Revision as of 01:09, 31 October 2006

Guess what I put in your LB buffer!

The University of California at San Francisco 2006 iGEM Team

We are engineering a steering mechanism in bacteria.

By redesigning a sensor/signaling interface, we could theoretically generate selective motility to thousands of different attractants.

The international Genetically Engineered Machine Competition is an opportunity for emerging young scientists of all disciplines to tinker with the proverbial Rube Goldberg machine of life.

It's this easy

Team Members

• Ala Trusina - [http://www.ucsf.edu UCSF]
• Patrick Visperas - [http://www.ucdavis.edu UC Davis]
• Kevin Shay - Mission High School
• Matt Eames - [http://www.ucsf.edu UCSF]

Faculty Advisors

• [http://www.voigtlab.ucsf.edu/ Chris Voigt] - [http://www.ucsf.edu UCSF]
• [http://kortemmelab.ucsf.edu/ Tanja Kortemme] - [http://www.ucsf.edu UCSF]

Aspirations, Dreams...

Which chemoattractant would YOU choose?

What if we could control chemotaxis? Could we put bacteria on plate and steer them through a maze? Would it be like operating a remote-controlled car?

These were the questions that inspired team UCSF to tinker with bacterial chemotaxis. Naturally, bacteria don't have the same electric components that your remote-controlled buggy does, but there are parts we can harness to control motility. Escherichia coli, for example, already possess five different chemoreceptors which respond to different attractants and repellants. If we were to place the bugs in between two separate chemicals, we might be able to control the direction of swimming by manipulating which receptor's signal we interpret.

The UCSF iGEM team has endeavored to control chemotaxis by selectively expressing CheW mutants which will participate in an orthogonal interaction with the methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein Tar. The project will be broken down into three major components:

• Design and construction of the orthogonal interaction: An existing orthogonal interaction found in the Tsr receptor, to be used as a starting point prior to computational redesign, was discovered by [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=AbstractPlus&list_uids=1860813&query_hl=2&itool=pubmed_docsum Liu and Parkinson] in 1991.
• Implementation of the genetic switch: This will allow us to toggle between the selective expression of either CheW.
• Validation of chemotactic properties through specially developed assay: originally developed by the good folks at the [http://www.physics.upenn.edu/facultyinfo/goulian.html Goulian Lab] in 2006.

The Orthogonal Interaction and Receptor Specificity

To selectively discriminate between the chemoreceptors, we will re-engineer the signaling protein CheW (which does not differentiate between receptors in its native state), to recognize only one receptor. This will require the development of an orthogonal interaction - that is two interacting partners that have no cross-talk between orhtogonal partners.

An orthogonal interaction for all seasons

Implementing an orthogonal interaction typicaly requires detailed knowledge of the interface. While no structure for the CheW-Tar complex yet exists, their unbound structures have been characterized. By computationally docking them together, we can observe that residues identified in the Tsr receptor as to having destabilizing/recovery properties for binding do indeed make contact in complex. This interface can be further redesigned using computational approaches.

Docked and loaded: Mutate these two residues and you get orthogonal bonding activity

Now we also need two receptors which are responsive to different attractants.

Much work is available in the literature regarding the changing of chemoreceptor specificity. Some of the options include:

• Directed evolution
• Computational redesign
• Chimeric construction (perisplasmic and cytoplasmic domains of the different receptors can be swapped)

We will be using a mutant version of the E. coli Tar (asparate-sensitive) receptor that has been evolved to respond to phenylalanine, a natural chemorepellant. The responsiveness of this mutant has been characterized and was found to have comparable chemotactic capabilities to that of wild-type Tar. Our phenylalanine-responsive receptor will bind to wild-type CheW, and our aspartate-responsive Tar will have its cytoplasmic domain mutated to accommodate the mutated CheW as its binding partner.

The Genetic Switch

A previously developed genetic switch using fimE to invert a nucleotide sequence (including a promoter) will be used to selectively control expression of the CheW pairs.

Light goes on, light goes off

The activation of the switching mechanism is under the control of arabinose. The genetic inversion is irreversible.

Chassis

Break it down to build it up

To eliminate interference from other naturally occuring receptors in E. coli, a strain with all receptors (Tar, Tsr, Tap, Trg, Aer) knocked out, provided by the Parkinson Lab, will be used in this work. The UCSF iGEM deleted CheW from this strain so that all CheW might be expression off the plasmid.

The plasmid will posses both constituitively active Tar varients, and will incorporate selective CheW control by means of a genetic switch.

A two-state system

Assaying Chemotaxis

We will use an assay developed by the Goulian Lab, which works almost as simply as spotting a bacterial culture on a plate with an attractant gradient.

A sneak peak at some sweet results

Thanks

• [http://www.chemeng.uiuc.edu/Faculty/rao.html Chris Rao]
• [http://www.biology.utah.edu/faculty2.php?inum=6 Parkinson Lab]
• [http://www.physics.upenn.edu/facultyinfo/goulian.html Goulian Lab]

Links

• [http://www.ucsf.edu UCSF]