First UW/UT Meeting

From 2006.igem.org

Latest revision as of 01:58, 12 July 2006

This is the review of the first Waterloo-Toronto meeting held via [http://www.skype.com Skype] on Thursday July 6th, 2006. Please review the important information about the third UT training session, and the new Critical Design Review Committee. And again, REMEMBER TO CHECK OUR WIKI MORE FREQUENTLY.

Attendees

1. Stephen Davies
2. Farshid Mirrahimi
3. Andy Hung
4. Herak Sikder
5. Arash Mirrahimi
6. Vahe Akbarian
7. Charles Yoon

The meeting began at 1:10 pm.

• The first discussion between the two groups (UW and UT) involved the progress of each team in terms of training their members in their wet-labs.

UW Progress

The method that the UW team has chosen is to have their two senior Masters students essentially train the interested members in the wet-labs. In addition, during the lab work they will have at least one of their Masters students present to overlook the activities taking place and provide any assistance required.

UT Progress

The UT team has provided, so far, two training sessions to the 15 members interested in the wet-lab exercises. Although the process has taken longer time than originally expected the progress has been satisfying (Thanks to the efforts made by the administrators at UT: Steve, Farshid, Seema, and Jessica.) The next step for UT will be slightly different as randomly selected members will be trained for Session # 3, due to the huge amount of resources this session is expected to consume, and the rest of the members will be trained by the originally selected members as time goes on.

• The second discussion involved the progress of the two teams regarding their Financial Support / Needs.
• The third issue discussed in this meeting was mostly amongst the UT members however must also be considered by UW. It involves the length of a complete cycle of creating one of our bio-bricks and possible problems we may run into.

UT/UW

According to Prof. Davies the process is likely to take about two weeks, which is a considerable amount of our most precious resource: TIME. As a result of this issue it was proposed by the UW team that each team prepares part of the Celsius Project that was planed for last year. The UW team could transport their parts through courier and the UT team would put the two parts together (Done Half and Half). A few other issues involve the problem of Gambling with biology, since the bio-bricks do not always work. A proposal for that problem was to use part of the replicated samples with some reporters attached to test that particular Bio-brick, by doing so adding the new data to our iGEM lab book and finally forward them to MIT. A new committee, The Critical Design Review Committee, was formed through the discussion of these possible problems. It will be responsible to review last year’s Project Design and possibly improve it by using updated (and easier to replicate) parts provided by MIT. ANYONE WHO IS INTERESTED IN JOINING THIS COMMITTEE SHOULD CONTACT HERAK SIKDER (email: herak_sikder[at]hotmail[dot]com).

IMPORTANT P.S. FOR UT MEMBERS

Last but not least as mentioned above the last training session for UT members will done differently since it is predicted to be about 7 hours in length. Prof. Davies would like to accomplish 1 session if possible during the next week. Those who are selected will be contacted as soon as possible about the time of their session. On another note there will be another meeting between UW/UT next week so please check your e-mails and OUR WIKI more frequently for updates.

Thank you all for reading and hopefully we will see you at the next meeting.