Lab Work

From 2006.igem.org

Revision as of 10:57, 28 July 2006

28th July 2006

6 minipreps were carried out for each of the two transformations done yesterday, and the inserts were cut out with EcoRI and PstI.

27th July 2006

A large number of colonies were produced from yesterday's work, so 12 cultures were set up from each of the two transformations to be incubated overnight, with minipreps to be done tomorrow.

26th July 2006

Digestions were carried out on the 1I terminator containing vector with EcoRI and XbaI, and on the LacZ inserts with EcoRI and SpaI. These fragments were ran on a gel, and isolated from the gel to ligate and transform colonies with the LacZ plus terminator plasmid.

21st July 2006

8 minipreps each were carried out on the ars and the 2 lacZ plasmids (24 total), along with 2 for vector with no insert as controls. The inserts were then cut out of the plasmids with the EcoRI and the PstI restriction endonucleases. These were run on a gel to identify successful cut fragments, and these will be used next week.

20th July 2006

The transformed colonies grew sucessfully. 8 individual colonies of each were placed in LB+ampicillin media for growing overnight.

19th July 2006

Ars and LacZ PCR fragments with sticky ends were cleaned up, and the vector isolated from a gel. Ligations were set up for two of the lacZ inserts, and the ars insert with a control of no insert. These were transformed into E.coli and plated.

18th July 2006

Hot weather resulted in general laziness and angst amongst iGEM team. Apart from that, the vector which contained the terminator, and the PCR fragments for Ars genes and new lacZ gene were digested with XbaI and PstI to be ligated tomorrow.

17th July 2006

24 minipreps were carried out on individual colonies that grew after being transformed with the (suspected) ligations between 7K and 30 and 9E and 1I, and cut with EcoRI and PstI to find if the ligation was successful on a gel. The 7K and 30 ligations didn't appear to have been successful, but the 9E and 1I ligation looked to have worked.

14th July 2006

The PCR products from yesterday were ran on a gel, and strong bands found at around 600bp for the arsenic parts, as expected, and these were extracted from the gel. The lacZ products resulted in two distinct bands for each different strain, so all four were isolated and extracted from the gel.

Conclusions from pH lab work

1. Experiments 1 & 2 indicate that we are using the wrong growth medium, if we want to achieve a neutral pH without lactose present
2. A response is indicated after 3.5 - 4 hours, but 90% of final state is achieved somewhere between 400 - 600 min
3. In presence of LB medium, without lactose, the pH stabilises at about 8.5
4. The maximum pH change was registered at 4.5, from 8.5 to 4.0
5. just adding water to the cultures instead of growth medium slows the response time
6. Experiment 3 indicates that a 50% culture to growth medium ratio increases the response time
7. Experiment 4 indicates that there is a threshold level of lactose necessary for the acid transformation to occur. Once all the lactose has been used, the bacteria revert to converting amino acids to ammonia, raising the pH
8. Other than the threshold level of lactose, the concentration of lactose and culture has no effect on the speed or strength of the response.

13th July 2006

We performed ligations with the DNA purified from the colonies transformed on the 6th, 7K (promoter) to 30 (RBS) and 9E (lacZ) to 1I (terminator). The recombinant plasmids were transformed (hopefully) into competent cells and plated on medium containing Xgal and IPTG, with a pBluescript colony also plated as a control. We also suspended more original colonies in liquid culture as a backup.

The primers ordered for a better lacZ gene, and the arsR and ars promoter arrived and we did PCR with cells of two different E. coli strains.

In order to determine the ideal conditions to achieve a pH response, three different growth mediums were established:

From these cultures we achieved the following results:

At the end of the experiment the pH meter was tested using pH 7.0 and pH 4.0 buffers. The 4.0 buffer was measured at 3.42 and the 7.0 buffer measured 7.21. Although there is a degree of inaccuracy in the measurements, the electrode was still functioning correctly after the experiments.

12th July 2006

The pH response over time was again measured but in this experiment, we used liquid cultures which were already saturated (i.e. in the stationary phase).

The results were as follows:

11th July 2006

Today we tested the timed pH response in 2 cell cultures: 1 with the LacZ gene, which was activated by IPTG, and one that had this gene absent.

We cut the isolated plasmid DNA with restriction enzymes to remove the inserts from the promoter and lacZ part, and open the vectors for the RBS and terminator. We ran gels, and these showed that the restriction had succeeded, but had not yielded much DNA. The correct bands were cut out of the gel to purify the inserts and vectors, ready for ligation.

10th July 2006

The colonies transformed on the 6th made it this time, and we isolated the plasmid DNA from three individual colonies for each biobrick. We also transformed some E. coli with

to serve as an empty plasmid for the new LacZ and arsenic promoter/repressor parts which we will create.

7th July 2006

Acid Production with LacZ and Lactose

When bacteria with the lacZ gene inserted are present in a medium containing lactose, the pH does drop significantly.

6th July 2006

Unfortunately the colonies we plated on the 4th did not survive due to a problem with the competent cells we used, so today we repeated transforming and plating colonies containing the following parts:

4th July 2006

We plated colonies containing plasmids with the following parts:

[http://2006.igem.org/Standard_Protocols Standard Protocols]

[http://2006.igem.org/University_of_Edinburgh_2006 Main page]