Event Processing Device
From 2006.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
(→Module Description) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | =Module Description= | + | =Organisational= |
| + | ==Group Members== | ||
| + | * Christophe, [[Dominic_Frutiger|Dominic]] (coordinator), Giorgia, Herve, Kristian, Zlatko | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Group Meeting History== | ||
| + | '''[[log050817|log]] 2005-08-17: Wednesday, ~13:00 @ polyterasse: Discussion of module, next steps, task distrib.''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | =Input-module Development= | ||
| + | ==Module Description== | ||
In a nutshell, this module has 2 system boundaries, both of which are characterized by PoPS. Its purpose is to take a single input PoPS and output 2 different PoPS. One of the outputs should be high and the other low when S is high and vice versa when S is low. | In a nutshell, this module has 2 system boundaries, both of which are characterized by PoPS. Its purpose is to take a single input PoPS and output 2 different PoPS. One of the outputs should be high and the other low when S is high and vice versa when S is low. | ||
| Line 22: | Line 30: | ||
| - | =Input-module Schematic= | + | ==Input-module Schematic== |
Below a preliminary parts-view of the module, i.e. encapsulation of biological specific implementations into a functional box with general PoPS interfaces. | Below a preliminary parts-view of the module, i.e. encapsulation of biological specific implementations into a functional box with general PoPS interfaces. | ||
| Line 44: | Line 52: | ||
P_in: promotor that allows the signal of choice I to bind. | P_in: promotor that allows the signal of choice I to bind. | ||
PoPS_in: polymerase per second dependent on promotor and concentration of I | PoPS_in: polymerase per second dependent on promotor and concentration of I | ||
| - | Reg: regulation genes. there are different solutions possible. | + | Reg: regulation genes. there are different solutions possible, see below. |
r: repressing signal. highly dependent on Reg, P_r and of course speed and binding considerations | r: repressing signal. highly dependent on Reg, P_r and of course speed and binding considerations | ||
a: activating signal. highly dependent on Reg, P_a and of course speed and binding considerations | a: activating signal. highly dependent on Reg, P_a and of course speed and binding considerations | ||
| Line 55: | Line 63: | ||
R_n: toggle switch gene(s) | R_n: toggle switch gene(s) | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | = | + | ==Possible Implementations== |
| - | + | ===Two Regulators (a,r)=== | |
| + | In the strategies below, the input PoPS regulates two proteins, an activator and a repressor. That has the advantage of being very simple, but requires that both proteins have roughly similar production and degradation speed. | ||
| + | ===="Basic" (Giorgia)==== | ||
| + | ====Antisense (Giorgia)==== | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | ==One | + | ===One Regulator (ar)=== |
In the implementations below, the input PoPs regulate the production of a sole protein that somehow acts as activator and repressor. With only one regulator, production and degradation are perfectly uniform, which is good, but in some cases, it might be harder to obtain a symmetrical activity, which is bad. | In the implementations below, the input PoPs regulate the production of a sole protein that somehow acts as activator and repressor. With only one regulator, production and degradation are perfectly uniform, which is good, but in some cases, it might be harder to obtain a symmetrical activity, which is bad. | ||
| - | ===AraC (Giorgia)=== | + | ====AraC (Giorgia)==== |
| - | ==="Lunatic Activator" (Christophe)=== | + | ===="Lunatic Activator" (Christophe)==== |
| - | ===Zinc Finger YY1 (Hervé)=== | + | ====Zinc Finger YY1 (Hervé)==== |
| - | ===Secondary Metabolism (Christophe)=== | + | ====Secondary Metabolism (Christophe)==== |
| - | ===Fusion Protein (Hervé)=== | + | ====Fusion Protein (Hervé)==== |
| - | ===Bidirectional Promoter (Hervé)=== | + | ====Bidirectional Promoter (Hervé)==== |
Revision as of 11:46, 18 August 2005
Contents |
Organisational
Group Members
- Christophe, Dominic (coordinator), Giorgia, Herve, Kristian, Zlatko
Group Meeting History
log 2005-08-17: Wednesday, ~13:00 @ polyterasse: Discussion of module, next steps, task distrib.
Input-module Development
Module Description
In a nutshell, this module has 2 system boundaries, both of which are characterized by PoPS. Its purpose is to take a single input PoPS and output 2 different PoPS. One of the outputs should be high and the other low when S is high and vice versa when S is low.
PoPS_outn
^
¦
high ¦ PoPS_out1 _______ _________ PoPS_out2
¦ \ /
¦ \ /
¦ \ /
¦ \ /
¦ \ /
¦ X
¦ / \
¦ / \
¦ / \
¦ / \
low ¦ PoPS_out2 _______/ \_________ PoPS_out1
¦--------------------------------------------------> PoPS_in, t
0 1
Input-module Schematic
Below a preliminary parts-view of the module, i.e. encapsulation of biological specific implementations into a functional box with general PoPS interfaces.
-----------------------
¦ ¦
¦ ,--- r ---- ¦
¦ / ¦ ¦
-------- ¦------- rep --- ¦
¦ ¦ ¦¦ ¦ -- P_r -- PoPS_out1 --> to R_n
I -> ¦ P_in ¦-- PoPS_in -->¦¦ Reg ¦ ¦
¦ ¦ ¦¦ ¦ -- P_a -- PoPS_out2 --> to R_n+2
-------- ¦------- act ^ ¦
¦ \ ¦ ¦
¦ `--- a ---- ¦
¦ ¦
----------------------¦
legend: I: input signal that will bind to the promotor P_in, e.g. heat shock dependent etc. P_in: promotor that allows the signal of choice I to bind. PoPS_in: polymerase per second dependent on promotor and concentration of I Reg: regulation genes. there are different solutions possible, see below. r: repressing signal. highly dependent on Reg, P_r and of course speed and binding considerations a: activating signal. highly dependent on Reg, P_a and of course speed and binding considerations rep: repression, indicated by horizontal bar act: activation, indicated by arrow P_r: promotor region to be repressed and/or "roadblock" region. constitutively active P_a: promotor region to be activated and/or "roadblock" region. not constitutively active PoPS_out1: polymerase per second dependent on P_r and r. PoPS_out2: polymerase per second dependent on P_a and a. R_n: toggle switch gene(s)
Possible Implementations
Two Regulators (a,r)
In the strategies below, the input PoPS regulates two proteins, an activator and a repressor. That has the advantage of being very simple, but requires that both proteins have roughly similar production and degradation speed.
"Basic" (Giorgia)
Antisense (Giorgia)
One Regulator (ar)
In the implementations below, the input PoPs regulate the production of a sole protein that somehow acts as activator and repressor. With only one regulator, production and degradation are perfectly uniform, which is good, but in some cases, it might be harder to obtain a symmetrical activity, which is bad.
