Critical Design Review

From 2006.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
-
'''Tuesday, July 11, 2006 '''
 
*[[ First Meeting, Tuesday, July 11, 2006 ]]
*[[ First Meeting, Tuesday, July 11, 2006 ]]
-
The First Critical Design Review meeting took place today at 3pm.
 
-
 
-
==Attendees==
 
-
#Charles Yoon
 
-
#Herak Sikder
 
-
 
-
==Topics of Discussion==
 
-
* What do the Design Review committee have ?
 
-
Answer: We have the design, the biobrick parts used for the design, the mathematical modelling and the basic idea of how the biological thermometer is supposed to work.
 
-
 
-
* What do we lack ?
 
-
Answer: No experimental datas to back up the design and its modelling. Most of the biobricks parts used in the design are not verified functionally via testing.
 
-
 
-
==Outcomes of the meeting==
 
-
* Each member should go through the design thoroughly. They should get familiar with the parts used in the design.
 
-
* A second meeting is set up on 13th July, Thursday at 3pm.
 
-
 
-
==Agenda for the 2nd meeting==
 
-
* Take the whole design apart and analyze it from bottom up starting at the parts level.
 
-
* Come up with a strategy to test the existing design. For instance: how to test critical parts of the design individually before integrating them into the overall genetic circuit.
 
-
* Come up with a reasonable time line for the testing.
 
-
* Think about the kind and range of values we are expecting from the testing.
 
-
* Discuss on ways to improve the design or to substitute parts in the design with better working part which have experimental back-ups.
 
-
 
-
 
-
'''NOTE: All the attendees of the meeting on thurdays are encouraged to bring print out of the design of the Cell-See-Us thermometer with you.'''
 

Revision as of 23:38, 12 July 2006

Retrieved from "http://2006.igem.org/wiki/index.php/Critical_Design_Review"
Personal tools
Past/present/future years