ETH Zurich 2006
From 2006.igem.org
(→test procedure) |
(→light sensing device) |
||
Line 216: | Line 216: | ||
## if cultures survive on the Ap+Cm plate inoculate liquid culture 5ml LB+Km | ## if cultures survive on the Ap+Cm plate inoculate liquid culture 5ml LB+Km | ||
## run tests | ## run tests | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== test procedure ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | # plate saturated liquid culture out on LB+envZ(15mg/50ml) plates. | ||
+ | # wrap one plate in something opaque, expose both plates to broad spectrum visible light at 37°C. | ||
+ | # the colonies on the wrapped plate should remain colorless, the ones exposed to light should become dark. | ||
+ | |||
+ | I suppose incandescent or (UV filtered) halogene light should be of sufficient quality and also provide some warmth. I'll have to improvise here. | ||
===== assembly progress ===== | ===== assembly progress ===== | ||
Line 236: | Line 244: | ||
# found colonies on all plates except the Cm control which is perfect!! picked one of the colonies from a Cm+Amp plate into a 5ml liquid LB+Km culture for testing. --[[User:Ajk|Ajk]] | # found colonies on all plates except the Cm control which is perfect!! picked one of the colonies from a Cm+Amp plate into a 5ml liquid LB+Km culture for testing. --[[User:Ajk|Ajk]] | ||
# poured 2x LB+Km+envZ plates --[[User:Ajk|Ajk]] | # poured 2x LB+Km+envZ plates --[[User:Ajk|Ajk]] | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
===== test results ===== | ===== test results ===== |
Revision as of 15:30, 20 October 2006
standing (L-R): Marco, Alexandra, Arthur, Olga, Dimo, Marko, Robert; in front (L-R):
Adding numbers is easy, isn't it? 1234 plus 5678, for example, is 6912. But how do engineers add binary numbers instead of decimal ones? And how, in the end, can this be done by a living cell? We, the members of the ETH Zurich 2006 iGEM team, are currently working on these questions, whereas the last one seems to be not trivial.
What the addition of numbers has to do with pattern recognition, how our model and the mathematical analysis look like, and how the experiments are realized will be explained on these wiki pages. We wish you a pleasant time with our pages. Enjoy it!
Contents
|
Coordination
TODOs
Modeling
- Parts Model the whole System with Sensing, Pops duplexer and Half adder (Marco and Franz)
- Model whether a different strength of input is necessary for the AND and XOR Gates (Who?)
- Finish modeling the second AND Gate and find a biological way to implement it and write the DNA and order it (Marco and Robert)
Lab
Responsible: Robert for the preparatory experiments, Olga for the assembly and testing of the gates.
- Read the literature on the XOR and AND Gates, check carefully for strains needed and compatibility of the parts (Who?)
- Prepare a protocol for parts assembly (Olga)
- Assembly of the light sensing device from the parts we received from UCSF Voigt's lab (Arthur)
- Assembly of the chemical sensing device (Franz, Dimo, Robert, Marco, Marko, Olga)
Documentation
Responsible: Alexandra for the registry, Arthur for the Wiki.
- enter lab experience report to registry
- Make a picture of the whole model with te different parts in it (Alexandra) (redundant to 1 Page Overview (pdf)? --Ajk)
- Make a drawing of the DNA to have an overview of which parts will be consecutively on the same DNA piece (Alexandra) (this is part of the #system deployment section --Ajk)
- Find promoters for the Pops duplexer (2 promoters in total) (Michael)
- make poster for jamboree (who?)
Presentation and PR
Responsible: Franz for the presentation, Dimo for PR
- choose two or maximum three speakers who will present our work at the jamboree DONE
- design and write the final presentation (with LaTex beamer class) IN PROCESS
- draw a team logo and find a team name
- design and order T-Shirts
Structure:
1. Introduction of the team and ETH Zurich and of the half-adder idea - about 4 min
2. Engineering Part - about 8 min
3. Biological part - about 8 min
(4.) Questions from the audience - 10min (I think, Marco (modelling) and Marko (biology) should also be ready to answer questions)
Schedule
Available as Google Calendar: [http://www.google.com/calendar/render?cid=pqi8ni6gnfj5r3o0np0h4smrr4@group.calendar.google.com iGEM 2006 ETH Zurich]
- Thu 20.7., 1700: kickoff meeting in CNB E 121
- 27.7.-3.8. 1st group phase
- Define project in more detail within two groups
Thu 27.7., 1700: meeting of entire group to share ideas
Thu 3.8., 1700: decision on final project - 15.8. 1700
- Tutorial "Modelling of AND gate"
- Until 20.8.
- Finalize DNA design, order it
- September,October
- Implement design (registry bio-bricks, ordered DNA)
- 27.9.
- Fix the flight dates and send the proposed flights to Jörg
- 23.10.
- Latest point to start getting our presentation going and to finish the iGEM wiki documentation
- 30.10.
- Project documentation on the Wiki has to be complete
- 4./5.11.
- Jamboree in Boston
Participants and availability
- Michael Friedmann:
- Dimo Brockhoff:
- Franz Zürcher:
- Olga Nikolayeva:
- Alexandra Choutko:
- Arthur Korn:
- Robert Schütz:
- Marco Terzer:
- Marko Jovanovic:
finding a project
Initial project ideas
The fruits of some brainstorming and research
proposed projects
We split up the whole team into two groups, each proposed a project after these two weeks.
- Meat monitor project (Michael, Dimo, Olga, Arthur, Marko)
- Half adder/pattern recognition project (Franz, Alexandra, Robert, Marco)
It was decided to further pursue the Half adder project idea.
design process
This could be documented as a hierarchy of global specification -> structural specification steps (ie after-the-book engineering process). Even if nobody had that in mind probably we can mold wathever actually happened into this pattern.
system level
system behavorial specification
- Write something with a chemical on a petri plate (like ETH for example)
- Let Bacteria grow uniformly on the plate
- Expose the plate to a picture (black and white) of the same pattern
- Result:
- Bacteria gets green when pattern on the plate and picture match (light and chemical)
- Bacteria does not express fluorescent protein when pattern on the plate and picture match (no light and no chemical)
- Bacteria gets red when pattern on the plate and picture do not match
light no light chemical A B no chemical B C
The outputs can be reported by fluorescent proteins, the mapping of states to outputs is arbitary, our choice is:
A: green B: red C: no fluorescence
Considering the green and the red output as being separate, the logic mapping the input states to the output states is AND for the GFP and XOR for the RFP. Together they amount to a half adder logic.
The whole system is only considered at it's steady state, dynamic processes are only of minor interest.
system structure
The whole process can be brought into a common input, logic, output form:
[light sensing]----->[ ]-->[reporter A] [ logic ] [chemical sensing]-->[ ]-->[reporter B]
system deployment
distribution on the plasmids, strains
system assembly procedure
system test procedure
system test results
device level
chemical sensing device
The chemical sensing device's PoPs output activity should be a monotonic function of the concentration of a certain substance in the cell's environment.
implementation alternatives
- Lactate lacI represses, IPTG induces ([http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_R0011 BBa_R0011] or [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_R0010 BBa_R0010] )
- Tetracycline, TetR inhibitor, Tet inducer by inhibiting TetR (or aTc, it's analog) ([http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_R0040 BBa_R0040])
- combination thereof ([http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_I13614 BBa_I13614] / [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_I13617 BBa_13617] / [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_I13623 BBa_I13623] / [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_I13624 BBa_I13624] / [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_I13627 BBa_I13627] / [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_I13637 BBa_I13637] / [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_I13653 BBa_I13653])
- simple sugar Arabinose ([http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_R0080 BBa_R0080])
I see the main difficulty in the spatial separation as the cells are growing in the petri dishes. since the inducers are water-soluble we would have to fix the chemicals onto the petri dish.
assembly procedure
where we got it and link to theyer documentation
Progress:
- 2006/10/03
- Made LB-Agar plates with antibiotics
- 2006/10/04
- Transformed cells, plated them
- 2006/10/05
- Found plates empty after 18h on the table, put into incubator at 37°C
- 2006/10/06
- picked cultures onto fresh plates
test procedure
test results
light sensing device
The light sensing device's PoPs output activity should be a monotonic function of the light intensity the cell is subjected to.
implementation alternatives
show how the existing light sensing device fullfills our specifications
assembly procedure
Olga got the strain RU1012(KmR) and the plasmids pCPH8(CmR) and pPL-PCB(AmpR) from Christopher Voigt <cavoigt at picasso.ucsf.edu> [Engineering Escherichia Coli to see light; Nature vol. 438.].
A autonomous light sensing system can be obtained by cloning those two plasmids into the strain.
- plate RU1012 on LB+Km
- pick RU1012 cultures -> 5ml liquid culture (LB+Km)
-
- inoculate 200ml liquid culture
- grow for 3h
- wash twice (that means centrifuge, pipet off the liquid, dissolve in fresh LB?)
- make them competent
- make samples
- transform with both pCPH8 and pPL-PCB
- plate on
- LB+Cm
- LB+Ap
- LB+Ap+Cm
-
- if cultures survive on the Ap+Cm plate inoculate liquid culture 5ml LB+Km
- run tests
test procedure
- plate saturated liquid culture out on LB+envZ(15mg/50ml) plates.
- wrap one plate in something opaque, expose both plates to broad spectrum visible light at 37°C.
- the colonies on the wrapped plate should remain colorless, the ones exposed to light should become dark.
I suppose incandescent or (UV filtered) halogene light should be of sufficient quality and also provide some warmth. I'll have to improvise here.
assembly progress
- 2006-10-16
- 2006-10-17
- picked a RU1012 colony and inoculated a 5ml liquid culture (LB+Km), plate in fridge --Ajk
- 2006-10-18
- diluted the RU1012 liquid culture to 200ml and incubated it again --Ajk
- it turned out that my interpretation of the lab procedure notes I got was too minimalistic, had to set up a new 3ml liquid LB culture from another colony on the plate made th 16th. --Ajk
- 2006-10-19
- diluted yesterdays liquid culture to 2x50ml and grew it up to OD600=~.4 --Ajk
- poured plates 2x Amp and 4x Cm+Amp --Ajk
- washed the cultures twice with water, once with 10% glycerol --Ajk
- one shot of electroporesis with both pPCB and pCPH8 and one control without plasmids, leftover RU1012 in -80°C --Ajk
- plated on 4x Cm+Amp, 2x Cm, 2x Amp, control: 1x Cm, 1x Km leftover transformed cells in fridge --Ajk
- 2006-10-20
- found colonies on all plates except the Cm control which is perfect!! picked one of the colonies from a Cm+Amp plate into a 5ml liquid LB+Km culture for testing. --Ajk
- poured 2x LB+Km+envZ plates --Ajk
test results
logic (half adder) device
Registry: [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_J34000 BBa_J34000]
As stated in the #system behavorial specification the logic is made up of one AND and one XOR gate, which are each another device, plus two copy devices to replicate the inputs:
[ ]------>[ ] A >----[ 1:2 copy ] [ AND ]----> X [ ]--, ,->[ ] X [ ]--' '->[ ] B >----[ 1:2 copy ] [ XOR ]----> Y [ ]------>[ ]
reporters
XOR gate
The XOR gate's PoPs output activity should be correlated to the PoPs input activity as shown in the picture:
input A ^ | H D L | D D D | L D H +---------> input B output: High, Low, Dont care
implementation alternatives
Part to be used in the prototype system: [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_J34200 BBa_J34200]
modeling
assembly procedure
test procedure
test results
AND gate
The AND gate's PoPs output activity should be correlated to the PoPs input activity as shown in the picture:
input A ^ | L D H | D D D | L D L +---------> input B output: High, Low, Dont care
implementation alternatives
Part to be used in the prototype system: [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_J34100 BBa_J34100]
modeling
assembly procedure
test procedure
test results
PoPs duplexer device
This device has two PoPs outputs which should in terms of activity be copies of the input.
implementation alternatives
modeling
assembly procedure
test procedure
test results
parts level
for every part we use:
- DNA sequence
- where we got it from
(links to the registry)
Maybe this could mostly be a hierarchy of links to the registry because it's preferable to have as much documentation in the registry as possible anyway. This is nice because it emphases our incredibly systematic engineering approach and documents the processes too which could also serve for coordination of the work in progress.
modeling
The contents of this section should be placed at the appropriate places in the design process section above and the rest moved to an external page.
Matlab scripts for ODE simulation
modular scripts
- contains a
createXXX()
script for each module. the created module contains- function handles for reaction rates: r
- stoichiometric matrix: N
- constants (inside of the function handles)
- state (concentration) changes (the ode dy values) can be computed by: N · r
- modules can be connected using the
createInOutConnector()
script. the result is again a module, consisting of the connected basic modules. -
sim_1_1
andsim_1_2
can be used to simulate modules with 1 input/1 output and 1 input/2 outputs respectively. - both basic modules and compound (connected) modules can be simulated
-
simulations
contains the first samples, simulating- XOR → simulation results / sensitivity analysis
- AND-tRNA → simulation results / sensitivity analysis
- IPTG Sensing →simulation results
- PoPS Duplexer →simulation results
- Compound module: IPTG Sensing → PoPS Duplexer →simulation results
- scripts: [http://csb.inf.ethz.ch/igem-2006/matlab_modules.zip matlab_modules.zip] (<0.1M)
old scripts
unzip the file, each zip file contains 2 files: sim_xxx.m
and ode_xxx.m
.
-
ode_xxx.m
: contains the differential equations, i.e. the model -
sim_xxx.m
: sets the parameters, calls the simulator and plots the result (this is the one to run, but the other is also needed).
- [http://csb.inf.ethz.ch/igem-2006/matlab_sim_and1.zip matlab_sim_and1.zip] (<0.1M) →simulation results → abandoned
- [http://csb.inf.ethz.ch/igem-2006/matlab_sim_and2.zip matlab_sim_and2.zip] (<0.1M) →simulation results → the pursued version A
- [http://csb.inf.ethz.ch/igem-2006/matlab_sim_and3.zip matlab_sim_and3.zip] (<0.1M) →simulation results → the pursued version B
- [http://csb.inf.ethz.ch/igem-2006/matlab_sim_and4.zip matlab_sim_and4.zip] (<0.1M) →simulation results → abandoned
As a result of the meeting on August 17, we will from now on concentrate on the AND versions 2 and 3.
- [http://csb.inf.ethz.ch/igem-2006/matlab_sim_xor1.zip matlab_sim_xor1.zip] (<0.1M) →simulation results → the only pursued version
- [http://www.tik.ee.ethz.ch/~brockho/igem2006/matlab_sim_xor2.zip matlab_sim_xor2.zip] (<0.1M) →simulation results → abandoned
- [http://www.tik.ee.ethz.ch/~brockho/igem2006/matlab_sim_xor3.zip matlab_sim_xor3.zip] (<0.1M) →simulation results → abandoned
Sensoring
- [http://csb.inf.ethz.ch/igem-2006/matlab_sim_iptg.zip matlab_sim_iptg.zip] (<0.2M) →simulation results