IGEM 2005 Awards
From 2006.igem.org
(Awards Given out at the Jamboree) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | The following awards were given out at the 2005 Jamboree | ||
+ | +Princeton | ||
+ | ++Best Plasmid Naming Scheme | ||
+ | ++Best "Show Must Go On" Moment | ||
+ | ++Best Honest Answer | ||
+ | ++Best Simulation of a Simulation | ||
- | + | +Oklahoma | |
- | Best | + | ++Best "Hail Mary" Cloning |
- | Best " | + | ++Best "Quantitative" Answer |
- | + | ++Feynman's Teaching Award | |
- | + | ||
- | + | +ETH | |
- | Best | + | ++Best Wiki Award |
- | + | ++Most Sensitive Super Model Award | |
- | + | ++Precision Engineering Award | |
- | + | +MIT | |
- | Best | + | ++Most Modest Goal |
- | Most | + | ++Least Transportable Visual Aid |
- | + | ++Best Analogy | |
+ | ++Second Most Parts Award | ||
- | + | +Caltech | |
- | + | ++Best Use of Transmogrified Smiley Faces | |
- | + | ++Best New Application Area | |
- | Best | + | ++Best New New Foundational Research Area |
- | + | ++Chuck D.'s Choice Award | |
- | + | +Toronto | |
- | Best Use of | + | ++Best Project Name (Cell-See-Us) |
- | + | ++Most Direct Use of Logic | |
- | Best | + | ++Best Advice |
- | + | ++Nothing-Will-Stop-Us Award | |
- | + | +Cambridge | |
- | + | ++Most Effective Approach | |
- | Most | + | ++Best Master of Ceremonies |
- | Best | + | ++Marshall Cultural Exchange Award |
- | + | ++Best Data & Data Visuals | |
+ | ++Best Uniforms | ||
- | + | +Texas | |
- | + | ++Best Confession / Negative Control (One Year Late) | |
- | Best | + | ++Best Live Demo, Again |
- | + | ++Best Model-Driven Design | |
- | Best | + | ++Best Proposed Funding Mechanism |
- | Best | + | |
- | + | +Penn State | |
- | Best | + | ++Best Brick Award (BBa_S03271, MotB) |
- | Best | + | ++Best New Sport (Beijing 2008 or bust!) |
- | + | ++Best Use of Metaphor | |
- | Best | + | |
- | + | +Berkeley | |
- | Best Brick Award ( | + | ++Red-Eye Award |
- | + | ++XXXtreme Presentation | |
- | + | ++Best Conceptual Advance | |
+ | ++Most Innovative Brick Award (BBa_J01002) | ||
- | + | +Davidson | |
- | + | ++Best Team Name (SynthAces) | |
- | + | ++Best Debuggers | |
- | Best | + | ++Best Interface Logic |
- | + | ||
- | + | +Harvard | |
- | Best | + | ++Best Part Numbers |
- | Best | + | ++Most Organized Presentation |
- | Best | + | ++Best Technology Integration Award |
+ | ++Most Parts Award | ||
+ | ++Best TAATACGACTCACTATAGGGAGA Award | ||
+ | ++Best Use of Redundancy | ||
- | + | +UCSF | |
- | + | ++Coolest Part | |
- | Most | + | ++Most Innovative Abuse of Expensive Laboratory Equipment |
- | Best | + | ++Best Device Award |
- | Most | + | ++Most Thoughtful Approach |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ==Highlights (some of the things that worked)== | |
- | + | +Cambridge - Chemical control of bacterial chemotaxis using BioBrick parts, writing DNA to store information (flipase switch) | |
- | + | +Texas - Working and improved bacterial photography and signal processing device (built from BioBricks) | |
- | + | +Berkeley - Two-way cell-cell DNA communication (could lead to a bacterial internet) | |
- | + | +MIT - Iron-induced control of any BioBrick device | |
- | + | +Penn State - Genetic control of bacterial chemotaxis using BioBricks (MotB) | |
- | Highlights (some of the things that worked) | + | +Harvard - write and erase components for a bacterial sketch pad; stamped bacterial patterns to make "biowires." |
- | Cambridge - Chemical control of bacterial chemotaxis using BioBrick parts, writing DNA to store information (flipase switch) | + | +UCSF - wanted biological temperature detector, got a programmable biological thermometer |
- | Texas - Working and improved bacterial photography and signal processing device (built from BioBricks) | + | |
- | Berkeley - Two-way cell-cell DNA communication (could lead to a bacterial internet) | + | |
- | MIT - Iron-induced control of any BioBrick device | + | |
- | Penn State - Genetic control of bacterial chemotaxis using BioBricks (MotB) | + | |
- | Harvard - write and erase components for a bacterial sketch pad; stamped bacterial patterns to make "biowires." | + | |
- | UCSF - wanted biological temperature detector, got a programmable biological thermometer | + |
Revision as of 16:13, 7 November 2005
The following awards were given out at the 2005 Jamboree
+Princeton ++Best Plasmid Naming Scheme ++Best "Show Must Go On" Moment ++Best Honest Answer ++Best Simulation of a Simulation
+Oklahoma ++Best "Hail Mary" Cloning ++Best "Quantitative" Answer ++Feynman's Teaching Award
+ETH ++Best Wiki Award ++Most Sensitive Super Model Award ++Precision Engineering Award
+MIT ++Most Modest Goal ++Least Transportable Visual Aid ++Best Analogy ++Second Most Parts Award
+Caltech ++Best Use of Transmogrified Smiley Faces ++Best New Application Area ++Best New New Foundational Research Area ++Chuck D.'s Choice Award
+Toronto ++Best Project Name (Cell-See-Us) ++Most Direct Use of Logic ++Best Advice ++Nothing-Will-Stop-Us Award
+Cambridge ++Most Effective Approach ++Best Master of Ceremonies ++Marshall Cultural Exchange Award ++Best Data & Data Visuals ++Best Uniforms
+Texas ++Best Confession / Negative Control (One Year Late) ++Best Live Demo, Again ++Best Model-Driven Design ++Best Proposed Funding Mechanism
+Penn State ++Best Brick Award (BBa_S03271, MotB) ++Best New Sport (Beijing 2008 or bust!) ++Best Use of Metaphor
+Berkeley ++Red-Eye Award ++XXXtreme Presentation ++Best Conceptual Advance ++Most Innovative Brick Award (BBa_J01002)
+Davidson ++Best Team Name (SynthAces) ++Best Debuggers ++Best Interface Logic
+Harvard ++Best Part Numbers ++Most Organized Presentation ++Best Technology Integration Award ++Most Parts Award ++Best TAATACGACTCACTATAGGGAGA Award ++Best Use of Redundancy
+UCSF ++Coolest Part ++Most Innovative Abuse of Expensive Laboratory Equipment ++Best Device Award ++Most Thoughtful Approach
Highlights (some of the things that worked)
+Cambridge - Chemical control of bacterial chemotaxis using BioBrick parts, writing DNA to store information (flipase switch) +Texas - Working and improved bacterial photography and signal processing device (built from BioBricks) +Berkeley - Two-way cell-cell DNA communication (could lead to a bacterial internet) +MIT - Iron-induced control of any BioBrick device +Penn State - Genetic control of bacterial chemotaxis using BioBricks (MotB) +Harvard - write and erase components for a bacterial sketch pad; stamped bacterial patterns to make "biowires." +UCSF - wanted biological temperature detector, got a programmable biological thermometer