Event Processing Device
From 2006.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Christophe (Talk | contribs) (Structure of Possible Implementations) |
Christophe (Talk | contribs) (→One Regulators) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
===Antisense (Giorgia)=== | ===Antisense (Giorgia)=== | ||
==One Regulators== | ==One Regulators== | ||
| + | In the implementations below, the input PoPs regulate the production of a sole protein that somehow acts as activator and repressor. With one regulator, degradation is perfectly uniform, which is good, but it might be harder to obtain a symmetrical activity, which is bad. | ||
===AraC (Giorgia)=== | ===AraC (Giorgia)=== | ||
==="Lunatic Activator" (Christophe)=== | ==="Lunatic Activator" (Christophe)=== | ||
Revision as of 21:44, 17 August 2005
Contents |
Module Description
In a nutshell, this module has 2 system boundaries, both of which are characterized by PoPS. Its purpose is to take a single input PoPS and output 2 different PoPS. One of the outputs should be high and the other low when S is high and vice versa when S is low.
Group Members
- Christophe, Dominic (coordinator), Giorgia, Herve, Kristian, Zlatko
Group Meeting History
log 2005-08-17: Wednesday, ~13:00 @ polyterasse: Discussion of module, next steps, task distrib.
Possible Implementation
Two Regulators
In the strategies below, the input PoPS regulates two proteins, an activator and a repressor.
"Basic" (Giorgia)
Antisense (Giorgia)
One Regulators
In the implementations below, the input PoPs regulate the production of a sole protein that somehow acts as activator and repressor. With one regulator, degradation is perfectly uniform, which is good, but it might be harder to obtain a symmetrical activity, which is bad.
