Event Processing Device
From 2006.igem.org
Christophe (Talk | contribs) (→Possible Implementation) |
Christophe (Talk | contribs) (→Two Regulators (a+r)) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
=Possible Implementation= | =Possible Implementation= | ||
| - | ==Two Regulators (a | + | ==Two Regulators (a,r)== |
In the strategies below, the input PoPS regulates two proteins, an activator and a repressor. That has the advantage of being very simple, but requires that both proteins have roughly similar production and degradation speed. | In the strategies below, the input PoPS regulates two proteins, an activator and a repressor. That has the advantage of being very simple, but requires that both proteins have roughly similar production and degradation speed. | ||
==="Basic" (Giorgia)=== | ==="Basic" (Giorgia)=== | ||
Revision as of 07:47, 18 August 2005
Contents |
Module Description
In a nutshell, this module has 2 system boundaries, both of which are characterized by PoPS. Its purpose is to take a single input PoPS and output 2 different PoPS. One of the outputs should be high and the other low when S is high and vice versa when S is low.
Group Members
- Christophe, Dominic (coordinator), Giorgia, Herve, Kristian, Zlatko
Group Meeting History
log 2005-08-17: Wednesday, ~13:00 @ polyterasse: Discussion of module, next steps, task distrib.
Possible Implementation
Two Regulators (a,r)
In the strategies below, the input PoPS regulates two proteins, an activator and a repressor. That has the advantage of being very simple, but requires that both proteins have roughly similar production and degradation speed.
"Basic" (Giorgia)
Antisense (Giorgia)
One Regulators (ar)
In the implementations below, the input PoPs regulate the production of a sole protein that somehow acts as activator and repressor. With only one regulator, production and degradation are perfectly uniform, which is good, but in some cases, it might be harder to obtain a symmetrical activity, which is bad.
