Idea 6/11
From 2006.igem.org
Contents |
Calcite/Calcium Phosphate Project (Idea 6/11)
Aim
To create a 3D structure in a defined area using bacteria which can precipitate out a calcium compound.
Background
An initial extension of this idea was to get bacteria to produce a hard material in response to one stimulus and then to degrade this material in response to another. It has also been postulated that it may be possible to produce synthetic materials, for example pearl, by modifying bacteria such that they produce different layers of material. Another route that could be taken is that of modifying the bacteria so that they produce a defined pattern made from the solid substance.
The most feasible idea appears to be that of engineering bacteria to lay down a solid substance on a path that can be defined by the user. In order to create this pattern, a good input appears to be UV light which can be used in a similar way to a pen. This is analogous to the Etch-a-Sketch device produced by Harvard in the iGEM competition last year. However, instead of the output being fluorescence, it will be the secretion of a solid substance. The two options that seem best for this substance are calcium carbonate and calcium phosphate. Initial experiments will be required to determine which of these will work best.
In essence, the plan is to produce a 3-D biofilm which could have many uses. For example, it may eventually be possible to produce biodegradable scaffolds for use in tissue engineering. Biodegradable scaffolds can be seeded with donor cells and growth factors, followed by culturing and implantation of the scaffolds in order to produce healthy, new tissue. There is a great need for bone substitutes that are required to fulfil many criteria in order to be ideal. Currently, there is no such material that could be classed as being ideal and it may be that a new route to synthesise these materials is necessary. Who knows, maybe bacteria could be the way forward…
Possible Methods
Initial colony makes phosphatase or urease in response to stimulus from UV, or absence of UV signal. The enzyme catalyses the conversion of calcium and phosphate/carbonate ions in the medium into calcium phosphate or calcium carbonate. An amplifier can be incorporated if the resulting amounts of 'hard' material need to be increased.
Possible Problems
How will the Calcium compound be restricted to only the areas activated? It could diffuse around the area and lose the original pattern.
How to activate the phosphatase or urease AND switch it off.
Possible that phosphatase and urease don't cause calcium compound to precipitate in sufficient quantities.
Parts Required
phosphatase or urease
More!
Experiments Required
Experiments for Idea 2.
Is calcium phosphate or calcite better at precipitating?
Urease vs. phosphatase.
- Proteus vulgaris produces urease and colonies of P. vulgaris lower the pH by producing ammonia. A test can be done with Proteus vulgaris to see if this causes calcium to precipitate from the medium with some different concentrations of calcium ions. Locate an E. coli phosphatase and do a similar experiment, to see which compound is the 'best' solid material.
- Locate urease/phosphatase in E. coli that is suitable. Find optimum CaCl2 concentrations, phosphate donor concentrations in medium. (Just test with genes coupled with constitutive promoters?) Can also see what happens when the medium, and if the medium becomes depleted of calcium or phosphate ions. End - Find a suitable ratio of calcium to phosphate ions in medium.
- Urease increases pH, measure pH change caused by different densities of bacteria, find if the pH change produced by E. coli in a lawn is suitable (high enough) for causing calcite to precipitate.
[http://2006.igem.org/Ideas Ideas]
