Instructors Top 10

From 2006.igem.org

Revision as of 18:20, 6 November 2005 by 18.50.6.172 (Talk)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
  • Have schools submit projects online as formal submission. All teams will assume they are to present posters and bring them. Perhaps all teams will prepare PPT presentations but X teams will be selected on short notice for final presentations and all others present posters. Presenting a talk is a reward for creating a robust wiki.
  • Publish projects in a journal as a collective proceedings, as long as contributors meet community standards?


  • Assembly process needs to be improved.
  • Need better registry annotation (a curator??).
  • Smaller parts list with better annotation, maybe 2 tiers, better annotation.


  • Need for better communication (Ambassador program), needed for scaling.
  • Need instructors to communicate more (teleconferences)
  • Don’t sit with your friends; try to meet new people.


  • New teams might want a older sibling team. How do teams develop institutional memory when teams are made of undergraduates continue to graduate?


  • Move jamboree to another time? January? September? Don’t move it?


  • A social event instead of a working evening Saturday night.
Personal tools
Past/present/future years