Critical Design Review

From 2006.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(19 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
-
'''Tuesday, July 11, 2006 '''
+
<!-- Members name -->
 +
<div style="float:right; border:1px solid navy; width:200px; background-color:#fff">
 +
<div style="background:#08457e; color:#fff; text-align: center; margin: 0.5em; font-weight: bold;">.Committee Members.</div>
 +
<div style="color:#2171b8">
 +
* Charles Yoon
 +
* Herak Sikder
 +
* Irena Mahdavi
 +
</div>
 +
</div>
-
The First Critical Design Review meeting took place today at 3pm.
+
<!-- Motivation -->
 +
The goal of the Critical Design Review committee is to analyze the design and mathematical modelling of the Cell-See-Us thermometer theoretically and to improve its design if required. The committee is also responsible for planning a strategy to test the design experimentally. 
-
==Attendees==
+
*[[ Third Meeting, Wednesday, August 9, 2006 ]] <b>( NEW!! )</b>
-
#Charles Yoon
+
*[[ Second Meeting, Thursday, July 13, 2006 ]]
-
#Herak Sikder
+
*[[ First Meeting, Tuesday,  July 11, 2006 ]]
-
==Topics of Discussion==
+
''[[http://2006.igem.org/wiki/index.php/University_of_Toronto_2006 HOME]]''
-
* What do the Design Review committee have ?
+
-
Answer: We have the design, the biobrick parts used for the design, the mathematical modelling and the basic idea of how the biological thermometer is supposed to work.
+
-
 
+
-
* What do we lack ?
+
-
Answer: No experimental datas to back up the design and its modelling. Most of the biobricks parts used in the design are not verified functionally via testing.  
+
-
 
+
-
==Outcomes of the meeting==
+
-
* Each member should go through the design thoroughly. They should get familiar with the parts used in the design.
+
-
* A second meeting is set up on 13th July, Thursday at 3pm.
+
-
 
+
-
==Agenda for the 2nd meeting==
+
-
* Take the whole design apart and analyze it from bottom up starting at the parts level.
+
-
* Come up with a strategy to test the existing design. For instance: how to test critical parts of the design individually before integrating them into the overall genetic circuit.
+
-
* Come up with a reasonable time line for the testing.
+
-
* Think about the kind and range of values we are expecting from the testing.
+
-
* Discuss on ways to improve the design or to substitute parts in the design with better working part which have experimental back-ups.
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
'''NOTE: All the attendees of the meeting on thurdays are encouraged to bring print out of the design of the Cell-See-Us thermometer with you.'''
+

Latest revision as of 03:12, 16 August 2006

.Committee Members.
  • Charles Yoon
  • Herak Sikder
  • Irena Mahdavi

The goal of the Critical Design Review committee is to analyze the design and mathematical modelling of the Cell-See-Us thermometer theoretically and to improve its design if required. The committee is also responsible for planning a strategy to test the design experimentally.

http://2006.igem.org/wiki/index.php/University_of_Toronto_2006 HOME

Retrieved from "http://2006.igem.org/wiki/index.php/Critical_Design_Review"
Personal tools
Past/present/future years