Tokyo Alliance: Significance

(Difference between revisions)

Latest revision as of 13:04, 1 November 2006

One of the biggest problem in Synthetic Biology is only a few numbers of inducer of transcriptional regulators.

As long as we use previous iGEM methods, it is arduous to construct regulatory regions to which multiple transcriptional regulators bind.

Combinatorial rewiring of these parts allows replacing regulators.

For example, if so, we can replace the regulator binding sites between -10 and RBS.

See our Construction Family Tree (Results Page) !

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-<center>[[Tokyo Alliance 2006|Top]] : [[Tokyo Alliance: Introduction|Introduction]] : [[Tokyo Alliance: Significance|Significance]] : [[Tokyo Alliance: Design/Method|Design/Method]] : [[Tokyo Alliance: Conclusion|Conclusion]] : [[About Tokyo Alliance]] </center>
+<center>[[Tokyo Alliance 2006|Top]] : [[Tokyo Alliance: Introduction|Introduction]] : [[Tokyo Alliance: Significance|Significance]] : [[Tokyo Alliance: Design/Method|Design/Method]] : [[Tokyo Alliance: Conclusion|Results/Conclusion]] : [[About Tokyo Alliance]] </center>
 ----
+==Our contributions to the iGEM and SynBio World==
+* Expansion of '''inducer library'''.
+:One of the biggest problem in Synthetic Biology is only a few numbers of inducer of transcriptional regulators.
+* Diverse '''regulatory region library''' by '''Systematic design/construction'''
+:[[Image:significance1.jpg|500px|]]
+:As long as we use previous iGEM methods, it is arduous to construct regulatory regions to which multiple transcriptional regulators bind.
+:[[Image:significance2.jpg|500px|]]
+:Combinatorial rewiring of these parts allows replacing regulators.
+:For example, if so, we can replace the regulator binding sites between -10 and RBS.
+'''See our [[Tokyo_Alliance:_Conclusion#Construction_Family_Tree |Construction Family Tree]] (Results Page) !'''