ETH 2006 Meat Monitor
From 2006.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
(→Possible) |
(→Possible) |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
* cadaverine, putrescine, phenylethylamine, histamine, tyramine and tryptamine where detected in [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=7576501&dopt=Citation], but there is no online access for journals older than 11 years :-( | * cadaverine, putrescine, phenylethylamine, histamine, tyramine and tryptamine where detected in [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=7576501&dopt=Citation], but there is no online access for journals older than 11 years :-( | ||
* 1-undecene [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=AbstractPlus&list_uids=6490566&query_hl=2&itool=pubmed_DocSum] | * 1-undecene [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=AbstractPlus&list_uids=6490566&query_hl=2&itool=pubmed_DocSum] | ||
+ | * different other components can be found here [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=AbstractPlus&list_uids=970942&query_hl=2&itool=pubmed_DocSum], but their production depends - among other things - on the temperature | ||
<br> | <br> |
Revision as of 12:59, 2 August 2006
back to → ETH 2006 Main Page → Half adder idea → other project ideas
- this page is under construction -
Contents |
General Idea
The idea of the meat monitor is to detect whether meat spoils. The design is not necessarily specific to meat rotting, but can also used for cheese, milk or other food. The only meat specific parts are the sensoring parts, e.g., sensing putrescine and cadaverine, produced by E.coli within the meat.
→ please add some more details here !!!
Input Signals
Possible
The links emerged from a short Google search and are possibly not the best choice --Dimo 13:39, 31 July 2006 (EDT)
- putrescine [http://ift.confex.com/ift/2005/techprogram/paper_31585.htm] → can be detected and synthesized by E.coli [http://biocyc.org/ECOLI/NEW-IMAGE?object=PWY-40]
- cadaverine → also in [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=MImg&_imagekey=B6T6R-3YYT6FB-1B-1&_cdi=5037&_user=791130&_orig=browse&_coverDate=12%2F31%2F1995&_sk=999459997&view=c&wchp=dGLbVzb-zSkzV&md5=4411bf20d1eb8fab281dac4708296f6d&ie=/sdarticle.pdf]
- Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) [http://www.pubmedcentral.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=12902260]
- tyramine [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=MImg&_imagekey=B6T6R-3YYT6FB-1B-1&_cdi=5037&_user=791130&_orig=browse&_coverDate=12%2F31%2F1995&_sk=999459997&view=c&wchp=dGLbVzb-zSkzV&md5=4411bf20d1eb8fab281dac4708296f6d&ie=/sdarticle.pdf]
- cadaverine, putrescine, phenylethylamine, histamine, tyramine and tryptamine where detected in [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=7576501&dopt=Citation], but there is no online access for journals older than 11 years :-(
- 1-undecene [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=AbstractPlus&list_uids=6490566&query_hl=2&itool=pubmed_DocSum]
- different other components can be found here [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=AbstractPlus&list_uids=970942&query_hl=2&itool=pubmed_DocSum], but their production depends - among other things - on the temperature
- using milk instead of meat, we could use some secretions from Pseudomonas species [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=AbstractPlus&list_uids=12147068&query_hl=5&itool=pubmed_DocSum]
Impossible
- AHL (Acylated Homoserine Lactones) has no significant influence on the spoilage [http://www.pubmedcentral.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=15240313]
- with putrescine and cadaverine, we (possibly) cannot detect Lactobacillus, Staphylococcus and Streptococcus strains [http://www.springerlink.com/(eufkk555jmvtbtjiletoob45)/app/home/contribution.asp?referrer=parent&backto=issue,6,16;journal,174,1323;linkingpublicationresults,1:108267,1]
Pro's & Con's
Pro's:
- inventive & humorous "offbeat" idea
- "practical" benefit (counter arg.: is E.Coli on meat really practical? → YES, definitely better than this [http://www.wilk4.com/humor/humorm26.htm] ;-))
Con's:
- logical part? (wasn't really logical! → it was only a first idea, but YES it was not logical at all)