User:Irina Petrova

From 2006.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
[[image: Ira2.jpg|left|thumb|200px| Irina Petrova]]
[[image: Ira2.jpg|left|thumb|200px| Irina Petrova]]
email: irina.petrova(at)biologie.uni-freiburg.de
email: irina.petrova(at)biologie.uni-freiburg.de
 +
<br style="clear:both;"/>
 +
 +
I am a PhD student of the GRK 1305/1 “Plant Signal Systems” program in Freiburg University. I work on detection and visualization of Arabidopsis thaliana root mRNA in Prof. Palme’s research group. I am interested in bringing science and design together.
<br style="clear:both;"/>
<br style="clear:both;"/>
Line 7: Line 10:
The dress design is more interesting than a chip design (to my opinion ;). It is very individual and very fashionable. We want to follow the fashion, don’t we?  
The dress design is more interesting than a chip design (to my opinion ;). It is very individual and very fashionable. We want to follow the fashion, don’t we?  
-
On another hand, a broad range of variable forms can be important for an artificial life. I play with DNA like with my Barbie doll.
+
On the another hand, a broad range of variable forms can be important for an artificial life. I play with DNA like with my Barbie doll.
The idea was to knit a nice blouse for Barbie without any boundary conditions. I used two methods of knitting: <br>
The idea was to knit a nice blouse for Barbie without any boundary conditions. I used two methods of knitting: <br>

Revision as of 16:55, 27 October 2006

Irina Petrova

email: irina.petrova(at)biologie.uni-freiburg.de

I am a PhD student of the GRK 1305/1 “Plant Signal Systems” program in Freiburg University. I work on detection and visualization of Arabidopsis thaliana root mRNA in Prof. Palme’s research group. I am interested in bringing science and design together.

Individual project: Nike Blouse

The dress design is more interesting than a chip design (to my opinion ;). It is very individual and very fashionable. We want to follow the fashion, don’t we?

On the another hand, a broad range of variable forms can be important for an artificial life. I play with DNA like with my Barbie doll.

The idea was to knit a nice blouse for Barbie without any boundary conditions. I used two methods of knitting:
1) rectangular merge pattern, and
2) staggered merge pattern
In the terms of Paul Rothemund. The first one is simpler for understanding; the second one is more practical for patterning. Only if you used the staggered merge pattern, you can put all hairpins onto one side of the knitted DNA sheet with a maximal density.

Have a look on the pictures:
(More details will be available soon)


Bluse on the wall
Bluse on the table
rectangular merge pattern


I use the fork hairpin [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_J35001 BBa_J35001] to create the Nike-logo pattern.
Other ones would be: [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_J35003 BBa_J35003], [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_J35004 BBa_J35004], [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_J35005 BBa_J35005], [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_J35006 BBa_J35006], [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_J35007 BBa_J35007].
Your choose!


[http://2006.igem.org/wiki/index.php/Freiburg_University_2006 Home]

Personal tools
Past/present/future years