Biosensor Characterisation

From 2006.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 61: Line 61:
| '''Total volume (ml):''' || '''56.27''' || '''106.27''' || '''81.27''' || '''66.27'''  
| '''Total volume (ml):''' || '''56.27''' || '''106.27''' || '''81.27''' || '''66.27'''  
|}
|}
 +
It can be seen that all the dilutions behave in roughly the same way, especially when the error in pH of +/- 0.2 is taken into account.  The aim of this experiment was to find out whether it is feasible to dilute the standard culture solution by 50%.  The pH of solution 2A which was diluted by 50% decreased at a rate very similar to that of the control solution, therefore it will be feasible to use this dilution in the final biosensor.   
It can be seen that all the dilutions behave in roughly the same way, especially when the error in pH of +/- 0.2 is taken into account.  The aim of this experiment was to find out whether it is feasible to dilute the standard culture solution by 50%.  The pH of solution 2A which was diluted by 50% decreased at a rate very similar to that of the control solution, therefore it will be feasible to use this dilution in the final biosensor.   
 +
 +
 +
Experiment 3 was carried out to find out what effect shaking has on the rate of pH change.
[[Image:Expt_3_graph.JPG | Experiment 3 Graph | 800 px]]
[[Image:Expt_3_graph.JPG | Experiment 3 Graph | 800 px]]
 +
 +
The composition of solutions 3A and 3B is the same as that of the control (which is the identical to the control composition used in experiment 1).  The only difference in the experiment is that neither solution 3A or 3B is shaken whereas the control is. 
 +
 +
It can be seen that for the first 4 hours, the pH of the unshaken cultures decreases at a faster rate than that of the shaken control culture.  However, the pH of the unshaken cultures stops falling after approximately 5 hours and begins to increase again.  This shows that for the initial experimental period, it is not necessary to shake the biosensor but following the first 5 hours (approximately), shaking becomes more important.
[[Image:Expt_4_graph.JPG | Experiment 4 Graph | 800 px]]
[[Image:Expt_4_graph.JPG | Experiment 4 Graph | 800 px]]

Revision as of 11:46, 11 August 2006

Experiment 1 Graph

Experiment 1 was carried out using IPTG responsive E-Coli with LacZ to find out what difference the total solution volume makes to the rate of pH change.


Experiment: Control 1B 1C 1D
LB (ml): 50 25 10 5
Culture (ml): 5 3.125 1.25 0.625
Lactose (ml): 1.25 0.781 0.313 0.156
Ampicillin (μl): 10 6.25 2.5 1.25
IPTG (μl): 10 6.25 2.5 1.25
Total volume (ml): 56.27 28.919 11.568 5.784


The solution with total volume 28.1375 ml (1B) produced the fastest initial rate of pH decrease and reached approximately the same final pH as the control (pH 4.84).

The smallest solution volume changed pH at the slowest rate and after an initial decrease in pH, it then increased to 7.87 overnight.

Therefore, in the optimum order, 1B > Control > 1C > 1D

Experiment 2 Graph

Experiment 2 was carried out to find out what difference the volume of sterile water added to the solution makes to the rate of pH change.


Experiment: Control 2A 2B 2C
LB (ml): 50 50 50 50
Culture (ml): 5 5 5 5
Lactose (ml): 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25
Ampicillin (μl): 10 10 10 10
IPTG (μl): 10 10 10 10
Sterile water (ml): 0 50 25 10
Total volume (ml): 56.27 106.27 81.27 66.27


It can be seen that all the dilutions behave in roughly the same way, especially when the error in pH of +/- 0.2 is taken into account. The aim of this experiment was to find out whether it is feasible to dilute the standard culture solution by 50%. The pH of solution 2A which was diluted by 50% decreased at a rate very similar to that of the control solution, therefore it will be feasible to use this dilution in the final biosensor.


Experiment 3 was carried out to find out what effect shaking has on the rate of pH change.

Experiment 3 Graph

The composition of solutions 3A and 3B is the same as that of the control (which is the identical to the control composition used in experiment 1). The only difference in the experiment is that neither solution 3A or 3B is shaken whereas the control is.

It can be seen that for the first 4 hours, the pH of the unshaken cultures decreases at a faster rate than that of the shaken control culture. However, the pH of the unshaken cultures stops falling after approximately 5 hours and begins to increase again. This shows that for the initial experimental period, it is not necessary to shake the biosensor but following the first 5 hours (approximately), shaking becomes more important.

Experiment 4 Graph

Experiment 6 Graph

Experiment 7 Graph


[http://2006.igem.org/University_of_Edinburgh_2006 Main page]

Personal tools
Past/present/future years