Talk:Quorum Sensing based
From 2006.igem.org
| (2 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- Dominic: I've added the protocol of today's meeting, but there are many things to discuss further. Also I think we should solve stage 3 with real [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quorum_sensing quorum sensing], i.e. A sensing a1 as opposed to B sensing a1. And of course, as we discussed, things can always be solved in an easier or more complex way (e.g. 3.2 division control or AND dependence in 4.2) - but the more complex, the more interesting of course. | - Dominic: I've added the protocol of today's meeting, but there are many things to discuss further. Also I think we should solve stage 3 with real [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quorum_sensing quorum sensing], i.e. A sensing a1 as opposed to B sensing a1. And of course, as we discussed, things can always be solved in an easier or more complex way (e.g. 3.2 division control or AND dependence in 4.2) - but the more complex, the more interesting of course. | ||
| + | |||
| + | - Dominic: I've made a major edit of the concept (see Basic Concept II). I've added lots of details, questions, and thoughts. Quite obviously, that doesn't mean that this is now the definite way to go. But I hope it makes the discussion, the feasability study, and the evaluation easier. If you have additional questions or comments, add them in the corresponding list. If you find answers, start an answers section with corresponding labeling A to keep track of things, i.e. | ||
| + | * Answers: | ||
| + | ** A5.1 X is feasable because... | ||
| + | |||
| + | - Dominic: split the text into subchapters, so that they can be edited separately and make concurrent working safer and the tracking of changes easier. | ||
| + | |||
| + | - Dominic: split and rearranged the former page so that this one is about the organisational stuff and the development history, whereas our current concept and details have moved to [[Project_X]] | ||
Latest revision as of 11:48, 11 August 2005
- Dominic: I've added the protocol of today's meeting, but there are many things to discuss further. Also I think we should solve stage 3 with real [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quorum_sensing quorum sensing], i.e. A sensing a1 as opposed to B sensing a1. And of course, as we discussed, things can always be solved in an easier or more complex way (e.g. 3.2 division control or AND dependence in 4.2) - but the more complex, the more interesting of course.
- Dominic: I've made a major edit of the concept (see Basic Concept II). I've added lots of details, questions, and thoughts. Quite obviously, that doesn't mean that this is now the definite way to go. But I hope it makes the discussion, the feasability study, and the evaluation easier. If you have additional questions or comments, add them in the corresponding list. If you find answers, start an answers section with corresponding labeling A to keep track of things, i.e.
- Answers:
- A5.1 X is feasable because...
- Dominic: split the text into subchapters, so that they can be edited separately and make concurrent working safer and the tracking of changes easier.
- Dominic: split and rearranged the former page so that this one is about the organisational stuff and the development history, whereas our current concept and details have moved to Project_X
