ETH2006 and

From 2006.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(parts: link to AND gate in registry instead of XOR ...)
(Current implementation)
 
(26 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
→[[ETH Zurich 2006#System modeling|back to main page]]
 +
== AND gate ==
== AND gate ==
-
The AND gate's PoPs output activity should be correlated to the PoPs input activity as shown in the picture:
+
The AND gate's PoPS output activity should be correlated to the PoPS input activity as shown in the picture:
   input A ^
   input A ^
Line 12: Line 14:
   output: High, Low, Dont care
   output: High, Low, Dont care
-
=== implementation alternatives ===
+
=== Implementation alternatives ===
 +
Different implementation alternatives for the AND gate were discussed and partially modeled. They can be found [[:Image:ETH_Modeling_Overview.pdf|here (early document versions)]], some [[ETH_Simulation_Scripts|simulation results]] are also available.
 +
 
 +
It was finally more of a strategic decision leading to the current implementation, though.
 +
 
 +
=== Current implementation ===
Part to be used in the prototype system: [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_J34100 BBa_J34100]
Part to be used in the prototype system: [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_J34100 BBa_J34100]
-
[[Image:ETH and trna parts.png| |center]]
+
An AND gate produces an output only if both input signals are present. We want to implement such a “device” by using a suppressor tRNA. In our proposed model Signal 1 would lead to the transcription of the T7 RNA polymerase. However, an early stop codon was introduced into the coding sequence, leading to the expression of a truncated, non-functional protein. Signal 2, on the other hand, will lead to the expression of a suppressor tRNA. This tRNA recognizes the stop codon, preventing the end of translation and leading to incorporation of a glutamine into the nascent amino acid chain, so that translation can be completed. Consequently, a functional T7 RNA polymerase is present which will recognize its cognate promoter (T7 promoter) and therefore initiate expression of the downstream reporter gene (GFP).
 +
 
 +
[[Image:ETH and trna parts.png|500px|center]]
 +
 
 +
=== Modeling ===
 +
==== Some Formulas ====
 +
(''general explanatory notes from'' [[Template:ETH_Modeling_Formulas|this template]])
 +
{| style="background-color:#dddddd;border-spacing:10px;"
 +
|-
 +
| {{ETH_Modeling_Formulas}}
 +
|}
 +
 
 +
==== Current simulation results ====
 +
{|
 +
|-
 +
| align="center" | ''top view, ht<sub>Prot</sub>=2h'' || align="center" | ''3d surface plot, ht<sub>Prot</sub>=2h''
 +
|-
 +
| [[image:ETH_Sim_And_2h_flat.png|300px|center|topside view of simulation results for AND gate, protein halflife period: 2h]]
 +
| [[image:ETH_Sim_And_2h.png|350px|center|3d surface plot of simulation results for AND gate, protein halflife period: 2h]]
 +
|-
 +
| colspan="2" align="center" | ''simulation results for AND gate, different protein halflife periods<br/>top / bottom: output (z axis) is mRNA rate (&sim;PoPS) / reporter concentration''<br/>(x/y: ''inputs'', z: ''output'', ht<sub>Prot</sub>: ''protein halflife period'')
 +
|}
 +
 
 +
For every plot, 25 (left) / 100 (right) ODE simulations were performed, simulating a time period of 12h. The simulations have been run with 2h halflife period for proteins. Complete parameter allocation can be found in the [[ETH_Simulation_Scripts|matlab scripts]] as well as the system of ordinary differential equations (ODEs).
 +
 
 +
'''About input rates''' (''general explanatory notes from'' [[Template:ETH_Sim_Input_Rate|this template]])
 +
{| style="background-color:#dddddd;"
 +
|-
 +
| {{ETH_Sim_Input_Rate}}
 +
|}
 +
 
 +
 
 +
The simulations show pretty much AND like behavior, but as mentioned, it is sensitive to the input strength. We want to find out about sensitivity more generally:
 +
 
 +
==== Sensitivity analysis ====
 +
'''Sensitivity matrices''' (''general explanatory notes from'' [[Template:ETH_Sensitivity_Matrices|this template]])
 +
{| style="background-color:#dddddd;border-spacing:10px;"
 +
|-
 +
| {{ETH_Sensitivity_Matrices}}
 +
|}
 +
 
-
=== modeling ===
+
The following bar3 plot shows sensitivity matrices for different input combinations:
-
''AND-tRNA'' &rarr; [[ETH_Sim_Mod_AND_tRNA|simulation results]] / [[ETH_Sens_And|sensitivity analysis]]
+
{|
 +
|-
 +
| align="center" | ''AND: Sensitivity Analysis''
 +
|-
 +
| <!-- [[image:ETH_Sens_AND_2h.jpg|600px|center|Normalized Sensitivity of the parameters for AND gate]] --> [[image:ETH_Sens_AND_2h.png|700px|center|Normalized Sensitivity of the parameters for AND gate]]
 +
|-
 +
| colspan="2" align="center" | ''Normalized Sensitivity of the parameters for AND gate''
 +
|}
-
=== assembly procedure ===
+
The z axis shows the absolute normalized sensitivities, the other axes correspond to different input combinations (shorter axis) and the parameters. The left most series show inputs, not sensitivities (3x3 inputs, each <tt>[low, medium, high]</tt>). The unlabeled series is a placeholder for aesthetic purposes only. Detailed explanation of the parameter abbreviations can be found [[ETH_Sim_Constants|here]]. Parameters are postfixed with the state variable they belong to:
 +
T7R  : T7 RNA polymerase
 +
T7Rd : truncated (deficient) T7 RNA polymerase
 +
mT7R : mRNA for T7R
 +
tRNA : tRNA suppressing early stop codon
 +
Out  : Reporter protein, here GFP
 +
mOut : mRNA for Out
-
=== test procedure ===
+
The figure shows
 +
* Insensitivity regarding <tt>d-T7Rd/l-T7Rd</tt>, which verifies our model since degredation and translation of the deficient (truncated) mRNA polymerase has indeed no influence on the system output
 +
* Various parameters are insensitive if at least one input is 0. This is clear since sythesized products from both input strands are needed for output stimulation.
 +
* Some parameters of the reporter protein synthesis are sensitive even if both inputs are 0. This arises from the fact that there is always a constitutive transcription part even if the promoter is not activated by T7R. And in fact, <tt>p-Out</tt> controlling the  constitutive portion has higher sensitivity if at least one input is 0.
 +
* Relatively high sensitivity to changes in the input rate 2 leading to tRNA production. Since tRNA is very stable, producing more or less tRNA has strong and enduring impact. The other input is less sensitive since the produced T7R RNA polymerase has a much shorter half life period. Changing parameters affecting T7R production thus has weaker influence on the equilibrium concentration<br/>''Unclear: '' Why can't we see this in the input/output surface plot?
 +
* ...
-
=== test results ===
+
==== More (old) simulation results ====
 +
[[ETH_Sim_Mod_AND_tRNA|simulation results]] / [[ETH_Sens_And|sensitivity analysis]]
-
=== parts ===
+
=== Parts ===
[http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_J34100 BBa_J34100]
[http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_J34100 BBa_J34100]
-
&rarr;[[ETH Zurich 2006#system modeling|back to main page]]
+
&rarr;[[ETH Zurich 2006#System modeling|back to main page]]

Latest revision as of 21:54, 1 November 2006

back to main page

Contents

AND gate

The AND gate's PoPS output activity should be correlated to the PoPS input activity as shown in the picture:

 input A ^
         | L  D  H
         | D  D  D
         | L  D  L
         +--------->
            input B

 output: High, Low, Dont care

Implementation alternatives

Different implementation alternatives for the AND gate were discussed and partially modeled. They can be found here (early document versions), some simulation results are also available.

It was finally more of a strategic decision leading to the current implementation, though.

Current implementation

Part to be used in the prototype system: [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_J34100 BBa_J34100]

An AND gate produces an output only if both input signals are present. We want to implement such a “device” by using a suppressor tRNA. In our proposed model Signal 1 would lead to the transcription of the T7 RNA polymerase. However, an early stop codon was introduced into the coding sequence, leading to the expression of a truncated, non-functional protein. Signal 2, on the other hand, will lead to the expression of a suppressor tRNA. This tRNA recognizes the stop codon, preventing the end of translation and leading to incorporation of a glutamine into the nascent amino acid chain, so that translation can be completed. Consequently, a functional T7 RNA polymerase is present which will recognize its cognate promoter (T7 promoter) and therefore initiate expression of the downstream reporter gene (GFP).

ETH and trna parts.png

Modeling

Some Formulas

(general explanatory notes from this template)

To get our models into a form which can be simulated, we needed to transform the wiring diagrams into a set of ODEs (ordinary differential equations), which in our case will be non-linear.

For every concerned species X, we write

d[X]/dt = production - consumption

For enzymatic transformation of substrate S into product P (catalyzed by enzyme E), we write

       k+1      k2
S + E <==> E•S --> P + E
       k−1

d[S]/dt   = −k+1[S][E] + k−1[E•S]           − dS[S]
d[E]/dt   = −k+1[S][E] + k−1[E•S] + k2[E•S] − dE[E]
d[E•S]/dt =  k+1[S][E] − k−1[E•S] − k2[E•S] − dES[E•S]
d[P]/dt   =                       + k2[E•S] − dP[P]

[S]   : substrate concentration
[E]   : enzyme conc.
[E•S] : concentration of enzyme-substrate complex
[P]   : product concentration

kinetic constants:
  kk+1 : building enzyme-substrate complex (forward)
  kk−1 : resolving enzyme-substrate complex (backward)
  k2   : product formation
  dXXX : degradation constants

For constitutive transcription, we have constant production rate and simply write

d[M]/dt = ktr•u − dM[M]

[M]  : mRNA concentration
ktr  : kinetic constant (transcription)
u    : system input, e.g. transcription rate (≅PoPS)
dM   : degradation constant for mRNA

A transcriptional regulatory module can be described by and ODE of the following form:

                       1
d[M]/dt = ktr ( a + −−−−−−−−−−−−−− ) − dM[M]
                    1 + (K/[S])α•n

[M]  : mRNA concentration
ktr  : kinetic constant (transcription)
a    : constitutive portion, 0 ≤ a < 1
[S]  : inducer (α=+1) / repressor (α=−1) concentration
K    : hill constant
n    : hill coefficient
α    : α=+1 for induction, α=−1 for repression
dM   : degradation constant for mRNA

Finally, translation is usually modeled like this:

d[P]/dt = ktl[M] − dP[P]

[P]  : product (protein) concentration
[M]  : mRNA concentration
ktl  : kinetic constant (translation)
dP   : degradation constant for protein P

References:

  • Modeling Molecular Interaction Networks with Nonlinear Ordinary Differential Equations. Emery D. Conrad and John J. Tyson
    in System Modeling in Cellular Biology. From Concepts to Nuts and Bolts.
    Editors: Zoltan Szallasi, Jorg Stelling and Vipul Periwal, [http://mitpress.mit.edu/catalog/item/default.asp?ttype=2&tid=10923 MIT Press].
  • Synthetic Gene Regulatory Systems. Mads Kaern and Ron Weiss
    in System Modeling in Cellular Biology. From Concepts to Nuts and Bolts.
    Editors: Zoltan Szallasi, Jorg Stelling and Vipul Periwal, [http://mitpress.mit.edu/catalog/item/default.asp?ttype=2&tid=10923 MIT Press].

Current simulation results

top view, htProt=2h 3d surface plot, htProt=2h
topside view of simulation results for AND gate, protein halflife period: 2h
3d surface plot of simulation results for AND gate, protein halflife period: 2h
simulation results for AND gate, different protein halflife periods
top / bottom: output (z axis) is mRNA rate (∼PoPS) / reporter concentration

(x/y: inputs, z: output, htProt: protein halflife period)

For every plot, 25 (left) / 100 (right) ODE simulations were performed, simulating a time period of 12h. The simulations have been run with 2h halflife period for proteins. Complete parameter allocation can be found in the matlab scripts as well as the system of ordinary differential equations (ODEs).

About input rates (general explanatory notes from this template)

The input rates (PoPS) have been chosen in the range of mRNA transcription rate, which was estimated according to the following assumptions:
  • E.coli cytoplasm volume is approximately 6.7*10-16 l
  • average number of mRNA molecules: 10
    → concentrationmRNA = 10/(6.7*10-16 * 6.022*1023) M = 0.0248 μM
  • at equilibrum, mRNA rate and degredation balance each other. Assuming half life period of 30min for mRNA, the result is
    → ratemRNA = concentrationmRNA * log(2)/30 μM/min = 5.7265e-04 μM/min

Amplifying/damping the input rates by small constant factors has influence on the qualitative outcome of the simulation.

  • it is thus important to know how strong the input of the gate has to be.
  • we can regulate this by choosing/designing the predecessor gate accordingly or
  • by changing the ribosome binding sites to strengthen/weaken the input signal.

We accounted for this by adding restriction enzyme sites to the DNA, so that we can cut out current RBS to replace it by another of different strength.


The simulations show pretty much AND like behavior, but as mentioned, it is sensitive to the input strength. We want to find out about sensitivity more generally:

Sensitivity analysis

Sensitivity matrices (general explanatory notes from this template)

To analyze the sensitivity of the system for all concerned parameters, we compute the sensitivity matrix S:
S = (∂x/x) / (∂p/p) = (∂x/∂p) * (p/x)
 
S : sensitivity matrix, #x rows, #p columns
x : states (concentrations)
p : parameters

We use jacobian matrices of the system equations to compute the sensitivity matrix S. We therefore augment the set of differential equations by

dS(t)/dt = Jx(t) S(t) + Jp(t)

Jx(t) = ∂f(x,p,t)/∂x
Jp(t) = ∂f(x,p,t)/∂p

Since we are interested in the output sensitivities at steady state, we set dS(t)/dt = 0 and can solve for S:

S = − Jx \ Jp

\ : matrix left division


The following bar3 plot shows sensitivity matrices for different input combinations:

AND: Sensitivity Analysis
Normalized Sensitivity of the parameters for AND gate
Normalized Sensitivity of the parameters for AND gate

The z axis shows the absolute normalized sensitivities, the other axes correspond to different input combinations (shorter axis) and the parameters. The left most series show inputs, not sensitivities (3x3 inputs, each [low, medium, high]). The unlabeled series is a placeholder for aesthetic purposes only. Detailed explanation of the parameter abbreviations can be found here. Parameters are postfixed with the state variable they belong to:

T7R  : T7 RNA polymerase 
T7Rd : truncated (deficient) T7 RNA polymerase
mT7R : mRNA for T7R
tRNA : tRNA suppressing early stop codon
Out  : Reporter protein, here GFP
mOut : mRNA for Out

The figure shows

  • Insensitivity regarding d-T7Rd/l-T7Rd, which verifies our model since degredation and translation of the deficient (truncated) mRNA polymerase has indeed no influence on the system output
  • Various parameters are insensitive if at least one input is 0. This is clear since sythesized products from both input strands are needed for output stimulation.
  • Some parameters of the reporter protein synthesis are sensitive even if both inputs are 0. This arises from the fact that there is always a constitutive transcription part even if the promoter is not activated by T7R. And in fact, p-Out controlling the constitutive portion has higher sensitivity if at least one input is 0.
  • Relatively high sensitivity to changes in the input rate 2 leading to tRNA production. Since tRNA is very stable, producing more or less tRNA has strong and enduring impact. The other input is less sensitive since the produced T7R RNA polymerase has a much shorter half life period. Changing parameters affecting T7R production thus has weaker influence on the equilibrium concentration
    Unclear: Why can't we see this in the input/output surface plot?
  • ...

More (old) simulation results

simulation results / sensitivity analysis

Parts

[http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_J34100 BBa_J34100]

back to main page

Personal tools
Past/present/future years