From 2006.igem.org

Revision as of 13:37, 25 October 2005

News

• 2005.10.25 Now we know that Blue Heron will not be able to deliver in time.
• 2005.10.24 We had a very intensive meeting on the overall concept and the documentation of the project. This page will change a lot in the coming days.
• 2005.10.23 One month after ordering, the sequences are still not ready. That means it is unlikely for us to complete the 4-State Device before the jamboree unless we find some alternative solutions (and have quite a bit of luck). See message from blue herons web page:

IMPORTANT NOTE: Despite Blue Heron Bio's capacity expansion, record order volume has created larger than anticipated queuing, which has increased delivery times for some orders. We are reviewing Estimated Ship Dates regularly to provide you with our best estimate of when your order will ship. We are working hard to deliver your orders as quickly as possible, and we are implementing new capacity management systems to avoid this problem in the future. If you have any questions or concerns please call our Customer Service.

• 2005.10.18 The parts for the actual Event Processing Device are ready, thanks to the hard work of Giorgia, Hervé, and Martje (not all test/debugging parts though)
• 2005.10.07 Message from Blue Heron: Sequences for NOR are synthesized and will be verified and assembled next week.
• 2005.09.23 Sequences for 4-State Device ordered from Blue Heron

Organisation

People

Students

Supervisors

Advisors

Timeline

• Meetings
• Classes And Talks

Tasks

• Task Assignement
• Documentation ToDo's

=Abstract= The project of the ETH Zurich team consists of the design and implementation [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_vivo in vivo] of a gene circuit that can count to 2. In essence, the counter uses two toggle switches, each storing 1 bit, to keep track of the 4 internal states. The design of the counter is highly modular, with the hope that it can be included as a unit in larger circuits, and also combined with further counter instances to keep track of a much larger number of states, up to 2^n with n units. To facilitate further developments and integration to other projects, the counter is available in form of [http://parts2.mit.edu| BioBricks]. Among many exciting applications, the availability of a counter enables the execution of sequential instructions, and paves the way for the execution of artificial programs inside living cells.

Introduction

The past few years have seen the emergence of the field of Synthetic Biology, in which functional units are designed and built into living cells to generate a particular behaviour, and ultimately to better understand Life's mechanisms. Previous efforts include the creation of gene circuits that generate oscillating behaviour (Elowitz00), toggle switch functionality (Atkinson03), artificial cell-cell communication (Bulter04) or pattern-forming behaviour (Basu2005). The present document describes the design and realization of a gene circuit as a basic device that counts external events to 2.

Concept

The counter is a state machine implemented as a genetic circuit. It has 4 internal states S1 to S4. The transition between these states is induced by an external stimulus with values 0 and 1 - denoting whether it is absent or present, respectively. Repeated stimulus will lead to successive transitions and finally to repeated cycling through those 4 states. Each time the final state S4 is reached an output signal is generated, thus leading to a counting behavior where every second event is indicated by the output signal.

In other words when the input signal is high, the internal state is either S1 or S3, when it is low, it is S2 or S4. Thus, one could also assign an output for each state. Then the outputs of S1 and S3 alternatively keep track of high input signal, while the outputs S2 and S4 alternatively keep track of low input signals.

As an extension one could imagine a serial chain of instances of this state machine which would allow to count to higher numbers, i.e. up to 2^n with n units

... put schematic of state machine here and extend above text (Robin, Dominic)

System Implementation

System Architecture

System-level Diagram

Device-level Diagram

As depicted above, the counter is made of two parts, serially linked:

• The Event Processing Device, which splits the input into two outputs: one feed through and one inverted signal - which serve in turn as inputs for the 4-State Device.
• The 4-State Device module, which uses these two signals to sequentially switch through the states S1, S2, S3 and S4.

Note that all interfaces have flows described in Polymerase Per Second (PoPS), is explained in details on the [http://partsregistry.org/cgi/htdocs/AbstractionHierarchy/index.cgi abstraction hierarchy] of the MIT Registry of Parts. For instance, the input can be of any nature as long as an adequate promoter is available (e.g. heat-shock using a sigma32 promoter, IPTG using a LacI promoter, AHL using quorum sensing promoters...)

Parts-level Diagram

... parts with the typical illustration as found registry.

Concentration Dynamics Diagram

Devices

Event Processing Device

Basic Functionality

Figure EPD.1: Schematic of the two output signals in dependence of the input signal (an external event) in the Event Processing Device

The Event Processing Device splits the input induced by an external event into two signals: one is basically fed through while the other is inverted. It is best described through its system boundaries. One of the outputs should be high and the other low when S is high and vice versa when S is low [Fig EPD.1]. Both output signals then serve as input signals for the 4-State Device and it is thus necessary that they have the have the same delay.

Biological Implementation

Figure EPD.2: Detail of chosen biological implementation of the Event Processing Device

To achieve such behaviour, we use the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lambda_phage| λ phage system], with IPTG as inductor. It is relatively easy to handle/debug, and does not restrict the module from being extended to work with other types of inputs. More importantly, it is already available as a BioBrick (Registry package 7.05) in its unidirectional flavour (In nature, the λ phage system is bidirectional, with Pr on one DNA strand and Prm on the other, overlapping). The following picture shows the gene circuit of the Event Processing Device in detail [Fig EPD.2].

cI is a dimer and regulates the activity of the two promoter regions, Pr and Prm, on the λ phage system. Pr is constitutively active and is repressed when cI binds to the two operator regions it overlaps with (OR1, OR2). Conversely, Prm has low basal activity, and is activated by cI. Since the two promoters are regulated by the same protein-operator interactions, repression and activation is expected to be symmetrical (a necessary condition, see results from simulation below).

Detailed Documentation

For more details, please consult the main page for the Event Processing Device.

4-State Device

The 4-State Device module uses two inputs to sequentially switch through its outputs 1, 2, 3 and 4. To achieve such behaviour, we use four interconnected 4-State Device gates. In essence, a NOR gate is a component that has two inputs and one output, where the output is only high if none of the input is high. Concretely, a NOR gate can be implemented through a promoter with high basal activity that is repressed by two effectors. In the particular case, our NOR gates have three inputs (or effectors), none of which must be active for the gene to be expressed.

The following diagram (which should be redrawn using better tools than ASCII art) shows how the four NOR gates are interconnected:

            R3 R2        R4 R1                           R4 R3        R1 R2    
             | |          | |                             | |          | |                               
     /|____  | |          | |  ____|\             /|____  | |          | |  ____|\                        
 ___/  R1  |_=_=__     ___=_=_| R3   \___     ___/  R2  |_=_=___     __=_=_| R4   \___
    \  ____|      \   /       |____  /           \  ____|       \   /      |____  /     
     \|            ^ ^             |/             \|             ^ ^            |/        
                   | |                                           | |                   
                   | |                                           | |               

               input 1 [PoPS]                              input 2 [PoPS]

The design is highly symmetrical. We have 4 genes producing 4 repressor proteins R1, R2, R3 and R4. The production of each protein uses either input 1 or input 2 as promoter, and is down-regulated by 2 specific repressors, the two "following" repressors as well as either input 1 (for R2 and R4) or input 2 (for R1 and R3). By design of the Event Processing Device, input 1 and input 2 have opposite activity, meaning that either R1/R3 or R2/R4 is active. Furthermore, since R1/R3 (respectively R2/R4) are repressing each other, only one of the two is active. Therefore, in a stable situation, only 1 of the 4 repressor proteins is expressed.

Let us assume that R1 is being expressed. Input 2 must then be low, and therefore input 1 high. This situation is stable and remains until there is a change in the inputs. Now, if input 1 decreases, and input 2 increases, the expression of R1 will come to a halt. Since input 1 is now low, either R2 or R4 will be expressed. At this stage, R1 is still present in relatively high concentration and by repressing R4, it tips the balance in favor of R2, leading to a new stable state in which only R2 is expressed.

Note that electrical engineers call such a device a "J-K flip flop". It can also be seen as a combination of two toggle switches (Atkinson03), each being able to store one bit.

Biological Implementation

We use Zink-fingers proteins (ZFP) as repressors. This class of proteins binds to specific base pairs on the DNA. Many protein-DNA interaction for ZF domains and triplet of base pairs have been described, therefore making it possible to construct artificial transcription factors by combining ZF domains in a modular fashion. The idea is to use a ZFP as a repressor by putting a binding site for a ZFP upstream of the coding region and thereby preventing RNA polymerase to transcribe the gene.

More details can be found in the dedicated 4-State Device page.

Mathematical Modeling

The simulation was performed through a deterministic model using ordinary differential equations (ODEs), as this approach is commonly used in modeling gene networks. Recall the counter architecture:

(S is here the input of the counter. Note that the work of the Event Processing Device is symbolized here by the dual effect of S, once as an activator and once as a repressor. In reality and as described in the section above, the input signal is converted to 2 opposite signals, both of them acting as repressors, alternatively.)

The 4 corresponding differential equations are:

dR1/dt = k_syn_R1 * act(S) * rep(R2) * rep(R3)  -  k_deg_R1 * R1
dR2/dt = k_syn_R2 * rep(S) * rep(R3) * rep(R4)  -  k_deg_R2 * R2
dR3/dt = k_syn_R3 * act(S) * rep(R1) * rep(R4)  -  k_deg_R3 * R3
dR4/dt = k_syn_R4 * rep(S) * rep(R1) * rep(R2)  -  k_deg_R4 * R4
         \_________________ _________________/  \_______ _______/
                           V                            V
                    synthesis rate               degradation rate

 where   act(A) = (A/K_act)^n / (1+(A/K_act)^n)
   and   rep(R) = 1 / (1+(R/K_rep)^n)

 K are affinity constants, while k are kinetic constants.

Since R1 to R4 all use the same constitutive promoter, all kinetic constants k_syn_R* have the same value. Solving the system in Matlab using reasonable affinity and kinetic constants, the result can look as follows:

As expected, [R4] follows every second peak of [S].

By exploring the parameter space and performing Sensitivity Analysis, the following conclusions could be drawn:

• Changes in the affinity/cooperativity of the zink fingers affect the system more strongly than changes in the affinity/cooperativity of the input S.
• The degradation rate of the zinc fingers is the most sensitive parameter.
• The affinity constants R1..R4 should be as symmetrical as possible, in particular the couples R1,R3 and R2,R4. A difference in the affinity constant up to an order of magnitude appears tolerable.
• ...

More details of the simulation work are reported on the page Modeling_and_overall_design.

Results

Discussion

Conclusion And Outlook

Appendix

References

Modeling and illustration tools,

bulter04, atkinson03, bates05, keiler01, suetsugu03, sudesh00, römling02, ross91, sutherland01, Lai04, zogaj01, miller01, basu05, goryachev05, you04, Isalan01, Beerli02, Mani05, Beerli00, Beerli98, Dreier01, Dreier05, Klug05, Yang95, Segal99, Segal03, cho04a-sensitivity

Glossary

Previous Ideas

This is the brainstorming and previous ideas section. In this section you will find other projects that had been pursued, as well as random ideas without too much consideration of feasibility, etc.