Tokyo Alliance: Conclusion

From 2006.igem.org

Revision as of 21:10, 29 October 2006 by Shogo (Talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search
Top : Introduction : Significance : Design/Method : Results/Conclusion : About Tokyo Alliance

Contents

Results

We searched several number of, actually at least 7, regulators inducible by different chemicals. This list is the candidates of such a regulator.

Candidates of Inducible Regulators


Using these regulatory sequences, we constructed these iGEM parts. There are 22 different logic gates actually made. Some of them are ANDgates.

Construction Family Tree (rev.1022)

We constructed YES gates and AND gates shown above accorinding to our Procedure.

Construction Index


  • B pSB Lacq prom. #4 J54202
    • B-1 RbsR J54212
    • B-2 FadR J54222
      • B-21 FadR tandem
    • B-3 TetR J54232
    • B-4 LVA
    • B-5 LacI (Library) J54251
      • B-51 LVA
      • B-52 LacI tandem J54252
        • B-52-a1 LacI tandem-TetR


  • C pSB LacI prom. #1


  • D pSB TyrS prom.
    • D-1 TyrS


  • E natural LacI prom.

Tokyo Alliance iGEM registry list

Data

Tokyo data 60.jpgTokyo data 61.jpg

Tokyo data 62.jpgTokyo data 63.jpg

Tokyo data 64.jpg

Conclusion

  • Conclusion

We can say we expanded the number of regulator genes we can use to build logic gates and through this project we made simple constructing method.

  • Future Work

It must be possible to construct functioning AND gates with our systematic construction strategy. And with same method, it is possible to make ANDAND gates, also. In order to make Noughts and Crosses game, we need 11 AND gates and 10 ANDAND gates.

Not tested yet, we already have constructed 7AND gates. It may not be so hard to complete the set of logic gates and combine them into Noughts and Crosses.

We recently change transition diagram and found that the number of inputs can be reduced into just 6. So the implementation of SYANAC will be little bit easier.

Personal tools
Past/present/future years